South Park should have been impirtal to the election
-
solmaquina — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 10:50 AM)
They don't want to use Donald Trump. That's why they used Garrison in the first place. They've openly stated that they don't think he deserves the satisfaction of being on South Park.
Movie sequels podcast:
www.facebook.com/diminishingreturnspodcast -
solmaquina — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 10:51 AM)
They've never remained impartial about things that matter to them in the past. Why on Earth would they keep quiet if they have an opinion now?
And I don't think it's particularly controversial to voice distaste for Trump. Or at least, if it is, it's fair to say that he started the controversy and brought it on himself.
Movie sequels podcast:
www.facebook.com/diminishingreturnspodcast -
Sluggr-3 — 9 years ago(November 12, 2016 01:06 PM)
A lot of comedians have signed the death warrant to their careers. I pretty much stopped watching The Daily Show after 2008 and even though I never really started to watch Colbert on CBS, I have no desire to after the sad pathetic b*ht speech he gave on his election special. It is sad that so many of them are unable to see the fascists they were backing (BTW, not much difference between fascism and political correctness if you are paying attention). Hopefully some of them will see what they were doing. I do know that a number of people in Portland that I chat with are starting to realize that CNN and MSNBC are not impartial news sources as they claim. One should look to the news for truth, not just for statements that they agree with. And even "the fake news" is no longer reliable in this regard. A lot of Hollywood people shot their mouths off hoping they'd be given a night in the Lincoln bedroom as a reward. I think unintended consequences is what the future holds for them.
My Chimp DNA seems to have lost its password temporarily. Sluggr-2
