I don't get the Force Awakens criticism
-
ImaWeabooApparantly — 9 years ago(October 29, 2016 04:05 AM)
The movie starts with a robot from the future sent to kill somebody from the Connor family. To fight it, the resistance sends somebody back to protect said Connor. At first, they don't trust the soldier they sent, but as the movie progressed, they develop a close bond with it. The final battle takes place in a factory. They destroy the robot, but at a cost, the Connor's protector dies too.
Did I describe the first movie or the second? -
CSM_Model_101 — 9 years ago(November 06, 2016 01:24 AM)
You described the first movie.
The T-800 wasn't a solider, and John trusted the T-800 right after being saved in the mall by the T-800. Remember he got pulled off the bike by the T-800 just as the T-1000 was about to run over John in the Semi truck it stole.
Plus the T-800 in the 2nd movie VOLUNTARILY kills itself. It doesn't die like Reese did in the first film.
The entire 2nd half of T2 is completely different from the first half which makes them radically different films.
T1 Reese and Sarah do nothing to stop Skynet
T2 John,T-800 Uncle Bob and Sarah actively seek out Miles Dyson and they go blow up Cyberdyne. Yes both movies end in a factory where the final villain gets killed off. Which is another homage to the first film.
Unlike Force Awakens, where the entire plot is a map is with BB-8, and they escape the sand planet Jaku via the Falcon (which somehow Rey knows how to fly and fix despite her never flying something that big before and never encountering it before btw), the new Death Star aka Starkiller Base blows up a planet (rather planets) to show it's superior firepower and destroys planets helping the rebels. Finn and Han have to go on a rescue mission to save Rey much like Obi Wan and Luke are on a rescue mission to rescue Leia in Star Wars. Han gets killed on a similar balcony just like Obi Wan did when both let their guards down. Rey shouts NO!!!! just like Luke did when Obi Wan dies. They escape Star Killer base and the base gets blown up the exact same way the first Death Star does (apparently in the 30 years between episode 4,5,6 the new Empire hasn't learned to fix that weak spot yet since this would be the 3rd super weapon the rebels destroyed in the same way).
The whole movie is just repeating the original film that started all of Star Wars, unlike T2 which paid homage and then changed the plot around half way through the film while paying homage to the original film. -
CSM_Model_101 — 9 years ago(October 27, 2016 08:07 AM)
it was liked by both critics and fans. Yes, it was similar to Star Wars, but it was still a good and very entertaining movie.
No, it's not.
IT IS THE SAME MOVIE AS STAR WARS FROM 1977. Instead of doing a proper sequel which they have 40 years worth of EU stories they could have adapted, they instead basically remade the first movie called it a sequel and idiots like you fell for it.
It sucked. And I will not rest until the whole world finally acknowledges that fact. -
peter-501 — 9 years ago(October 28, 2016 11:47 AM)
Agreed, It is a remake that basically cast the original actors.
The funniest part is that it basically crapped all over the Expanded Universe stuff too - now called "Legends." It even took elements from the EU stories in the process, which does make one wonder why it wasn't just set in that universe.
Because now they can make a whole bunch more crappy novels and comics - and get the fanboys to buy it all over again.
A real space station could have been built for the money that has been produced from Star Wars! -
Jeff0015 — 9 years ago(October 27, 2016 11:08 AM)
Since TFA truly is a bulletproof movie, South Park panning it is their way of TROLLING US! Hahah. The criticism that it is more of a reunion or retread is something I reject. A millenial Sith Lord and female Jedi is original AF!
-
chutcher — 9 years ago(October 28, 2016 09:36 PM)
Kinda a mixed bag for me. Sure, it had some cool scenes, but other than "you know who" dying, no real shock factor. The planet weapon should've shown a helluva lot more destruction. The nostalgia was nice. Not a movie I'd buy on DVD or go back to the theater to see. It is on HBO, and I did watch it again. Same result though.
-
Airman87 — 9 years ago(October 29, 2016 01:08 AM)
When I first saw it the nostalgia was right there, because we hadn't seen those actors on screen in over 30 years. I think many people were blinded by emotion.
The more I think about it, though, the less I like it. I have a feeling the film won't stand up well to time.
When logic and science aren't on your side, you always lose.
-
WeAintFoundShin — 9 years ago(November 06, 2016 11:08 AM)
OP, corrected it: it was liked by some critics and some fans. Yes, it was similar to Star Wars, but it was still adequate at times but also cringey at times, and a very promising at times and narm at times movie.
-
MacRobin92 — 9 years ago(November 06, 2016 11:44 PM)
Force Awakens is almost A New Hope for this generation.
I don't personally see a lot wrong with that. I still enjoyed the movie.
I don't really care if the new movies are terrible or not. I have the old ones to enjoy and the extended universe. I'll let the new generation enjoy this one.