how rude american soldiers are!
-
abt_e2004 — 19 years ago(August 22, 2006 07:28 AM)
I am not Einstein and do not generalize american soldiers in one or more category but I am talking about some thing of the reality cuase I am Iraqi and we do not have to deal with their disturbed temperment or predilection about normal thing!
-
hllhart75 — 19 years ago(September 23, 2006 05:31 PM)
If you're Iraqi, then answer the question. What have you personally done to protect your women or even to advance their right to be autonomous in your country? Furthermore, I am sure the average Iraqi woman is in no more danger of being raped now than before America's presence in Iraq. Sadam's sons alone should have been a threat to their security!
-
oagrintel — 17 years ago(January 10, 2009 12:23 AM)
Probably not a good idea to identify yourself as an Iraqi and try and throw stones at the US military on the issue of rape.
I'm in Iraq now, and one of the issues here now is Iraqi men raping Iraqi women. Iraqi men feel perfectly free to rape a woman out alone in an Iraqi man's mind, it's her fault for going out without a male relative to escort her, and if she has no male relative, then she's up for grabs.
Insult to injury, the man isn't held accountable, it's the woman who is to be killed by a male relative as an 'honor killing' for allowing herself to be raped. -
TtankerT — 19 years ago(September 19, 2006 09:18 AM)
y'all do know this movie was made in late 90's rightI believe in 1999ya know 2 years before 9/114 years before Desert Storm 2..but I do see your pointyes it does give some Soldiers bad names..(note..anyone else, past or present miltary, notice all the baddies were officersjust a thought.)
Look would everyone stop with the whole bashing each other sideremember both parties are being fed one side of the storythus how it sucks that the US media focus on the negitives that our Marines and soldiers do.I'd like to post a few things about them but this site won't allow it.
Case in pointI believe it was in October of 04..there was a First Sergeant in the Army at is base in Iraq..(long time ago, facts are a bit blury) anyhow he was taking some time of duty watching some of the enlisted play a friendly game of basketballnow what happened was that a gernade landed near the soldiers playing..the First Sergeant ran and dove on the gernade taking the full force of the blast..thus killing him but saving the lives of the soldiers around himnow out of the thousands of papers, hundreds of news stations in the USonly One Station and One paper covered the story his home town.
Can't remember who said it.but " Your convicted of a serious crimeyour on page 1Your found not guilty of that crime they bury it on page 8. -
durbie01 — 19 years ago(November 28, 2006 09:36 PM)
Soldiers are in a rude business.
Sometimes they crack & do bad things when they are repeatedly, over-used, and mis-used. (not properly trained for roles they are forced into, by the secure, Washington top elected officials, bureaucrats, & professor types, [most who have never served in uniform] geniuses.)
Isn't it a damn shame when G.I.s offend the sensibilities of "polite" society. -
eeobugga — 19 years ago(November 30, 2006 07:22 AM)
Who was it who said, "in time of peace, soldiers and dogs, keep off the grass"?
Rude my God (or is it Allah not to offend anyone's sensibilities)!!! I'm sorry, but they have a job to do and don't have time to be courteous to their enemies and in Iraq no one wears a Nazi or Japanese uniform to distinguish them from innocent civilians -
bb_bryson — 12 years ago(February 04, 2014 06:37 PM)
There is so much wrong with your statement. "the ones fighting in the name of good old 'Allah' hide their identity totally. Most other forces go into battle bare faced and proud."
Yeah, it is called insurgencywhat you've never heard of La Resistance in France during WW2, or the Partisans for that matteror how about the plain coats during the American independence war? The whole notion of two lines of soldiers both waving their flags in uniforms and what not is a very old notion and best suited when both sides are of equal strength. When one side is vastly more superior, you need to be a little more crafty or be killed in 2 seconds.
Let me remind you, the Iraqis who killed Americans in the Iraq war were not terrorists, nor were the Vietkong in the Vietnam war. America INVADED their country and in their mind they were trying to stop an aggressive outside force. How would you feel if another country invaded America? Would you say "I don't mind" or would you fight against them? And let's say the American army were wiped out and it is only a handful of resistance fighters, would you wear a uniform to be killed or would you try to inflict the maximum damage to stop the enemy?
America is NOT the underdog in any of these situations, it is the bully - who has used its power over the past 60 years to push around countries all over the map. South America, "America's backyard", had been pushed around by CIA forces for years to install American business-friendly governments, same with the Shah in Iran, and more. Perhaps you should think a little more deeply about these issues before you say something as ridiculous as what you just wrote.
Oh and by the way this thread is about American soldiers raping women - you know just in case you forgot in your haze of jingoism. And about the rape issue, most American soldiers don't rape anybody, but enough do that it is getting noticed. What is worse about these rapes is that the victims rarely get justice - especially if they are a local 'ferners'. Where I live, 3 American servicemen raped a 12 year old girl a few years back, and rape continues until today with little, if any, justice for the women whose lives they've destroyed. -
Deathkneeler — 16 years ago(September 24, 2009 01:47 PM)
Well.. Abt If you ever get back on here..
When it's legal in a country they don't have a problem with. The bad thing is this happens all the time in Iraq and most of the time if a woman is married it is considered adultry.. Why don't you explain what happens to the woman to the posters if this is found out?
OIF 3 and OIF 5
If you want to be a smart ass, have some experience to back it up. -
Simon-140 — 11 years ago(September 06, 2014 07:50 AM)
Oddly, the status and education of women was
much
higher under Saddam Hussein's secular Baathist power.
There
may
have been good reasons for invading Iraq, but WMDs, rape, education and health care were not among them: rape has soared since the US invasion; the Iraqi educational system, which produced a 95% literacy rate, has collapsed, and the formerly free, reasonably good health care system has been ruined by the US.
Saddam Hussein was a monster, but at least his monstrous reign harmed comparatively few. The slightly less nauseating US transitional government (have you seen "Collateral Murder"?) destroyed Iraq's infrastructure and then wasted Iraq's savings in a criminal way.
I have trouble deciding which side was worse.
In the long term, I suspect the US legacy will be more damaging to Arabs and Westerners than the legacy of Saddam Hussein. The US invasion will come back to haunt them - just like the CIA's backing and arming of Osama bin Laden, when he was an anti-Soviet "freedom fighter" (to use Ronald Reagan's words).