Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Pales in comparison.

Pales in comparison.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
1 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — War of the Worlds


    mlaiuppa — 9 years ago(January 30, 2017 02:28 AM)

    Sorry, Spielberg. I generally like your stuff but this movie was way off the mark.
    I've seen the orignal with Gene Barry and even after all these decades it's still superior to this dreck.
    While I appreciate the homage to the illustrations of some of the original pulp copies of War of the Worlds, in general this movie just sucked.
    I hated the characters, the plot, even the special effects.
    It was just awful. Not Gigli awful but awful just the same.
    And pointless.
    I wanted to slap the son. I wanted to slap the Dad. The stupidity. The coincidences.
    What a waste of time, money and celluloid. (Yeah, I know they don't use celluloid any more but you get the point.)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups