Who is your suspect?
-
longcandle — 9 years ago(December 12, 2016 05:11 PM)
Which is why you're posting one-liners on here, right, "Bugs"? Even your Sullivan-central ZKS hasn't been talking about Ross for months What a bad joke of a suspect! As Trump would say on IMDb: "YOU'RE BLOCKED!"
-
ophion1031 — 9 years ago(January 08, 2017 11:31 PM)
I don't think Ross is a "joke" of a suspect. He is probably the best suspect for the Bates murder, but nobody can be sure she was a Zodiac victim. I haven't seen anything to rule Ross out, but there is definitely not enough to make him a top suspect. It's just a tough task finding info on him, and his whereabouts are kind of unknown during the murders.
-
longcandle — 9 years ago(January 09, 2017 06:53 AM)
Which is why, long before the New Year, "Ross" threads dried up over at ZKS where you are an active member, Ophion. Admin, Morf has gone AWOL like Voigt over his "GAIK." Perhaps Morford & Voigt will have better luck with their ongoing search for Sasquatch.
"It's just a tough task finding info on him, and his whereabouts are kind of unknown during the murders."
Conveniently, for Morford and his flunkies who undoubtedly seek to milk this for many more years, the pitiable, obese, schizophrenic Ross was institutionalized and surprise! that confidential "whereabouts" data is sealed.
It has become the nauseating regurgitation of three tenuous generalities about Sullivan, the RCC library, and the Presidio sketch, which is so accurate that ZKS members are now matching it to Joe Stine, Paul's brother!
Morford and his assembled team of amateurs could have done this work on a P.O.I. in private, but he just had to stake his public name (and their anonymous names) on it libeling the surviving Sullivan relatives in the process.
Actions
meet
Consequences
. -
morfm — 9 years ago(January 20, 2017 03:35 PM)
@Longcandle, you're a joke hiding behind an anonymous screen name, though I have a good idea who you are. One difference between you and I, is that I know more about this case then you can ever hope to know. There's an old saying"those who can't play coach". That's you. You don't know go out and dig for answers or for suspects, you just comment negatively on others that do. Man up and don't hide behind a screen name. and let's talk some Zodiac.
I am not selling anybody on Ross, and I don't care who People like or don't like as a Suspect,but get the facts right.
Ross being 'Obese'?? Not correct,at the time of his death he may have been, but during Z crimes, witnesses described as stocky, powerful, and solid. Not one called him Fat or obese, and one Guy said he was around 260.
Ross not driving?? There has been a witness that mentioned a motorcycle, and a VW Bug.
Get your facts straight,and produce your own Suspectif you have any skills to. Some things are not known about Ross, that's true, but two things are and can not be disputed, Ross looks identical to the sketch of Zodiac, and Ross worked in the Riverside Library where Zodiac's writing was found. These are inconvenient truths for you!
For those that want to really learn about the case and make their own decisions about Zodiac,(don't just listen to me, or worse yet,listen to Longcandle)check out my site:
zodiackillersite.com
Mike Morford(I don't hide behind anonymous screen names) -
longcandle — 9 years ago(January 21, 2017 09:02 AM)
"Bugs Moran," "duckking2001," Ophion, Morford, Styslinger, etc., etc. Welcome all to
ZKS
on
IMDb
, as they seek to saturate every available website with their drivel.
witnesses described
[Ross]
as stocky, powerful, and solid.
Get back to us when you have photos in place of weak hearsay. Your own members forever bicker over weight estimates with what little you do have.
When it comes to the mental illness, schizophrenia, you've demonstrated yourself to be an ignoramus who would rather reference Russell Crowe movies than do some serious research. You and "Paul_Averly" need to educate yourselves on the disorder, and for a start: psychosis vs. psychopathy (antisocial personality disorder)beyond your Netflix psychology internship. Stop the stereotyping
or else
SHUT UP.
So where
did
your Ross threads go Morford? That is, if you have gathered so much convincing circumstantial evidence on him besides the three tenuous generalities you've been parroting for years.
EDIT UPDATE:
Furthermore, Morford, as of Jan. 30, 2017, why did you heavily censor your YouTube videos' comments on Ross in order to remove dissenting opinion or posts asking you for more evidence? Oops! You'd best take down that recent
ZKS
thread where your staff agrees on how much Paul's brother, Joe Stine (!) resembles the Presidio sketch or half the crew cut population of American youth in 1960's yearbooks.
Did it finally sink in that libeling the surviving Sullivan family is not cool? Did it at last occur to you that people outside your egocentric mini-world are keeping them updated (from inside
ZKS
!) and advising them on their legal options?
Inconvenient? For you, rather, and your retinue of anonymous Kowakian monkey-lizard trolls. Any "circumstantial" evidence on Sullivan can't hold a candle (
) to what there is on Allen. Get busy with your own
IMDb
movie just don't be sued! This forum is about Fincher's
Zodiac
, which has nothing to do with failed "suspect," R. Sullivan or "The Pigeon Boy of Albany." Oh, yeah, how's that Pigeon Boy trail of breadcrumbs coming along?
EDIT:
Prints
?
Ballistics
?
Right! As if, he would keep the same guns & ammo decades longer, even beyond his molestation conviction. Morford boasts expertise on the case but clearly doesn't read the posts/threads on his site from members with connections to L.E. today who have informed doubts about the reliability of original (blood/saliva/prints) "evidence." Moreover, investigators cannot match any of those across letters and/or crime scenes.
Morford holds the innocent Sullivan family's feet to the fire by forever publicly challenging them to DNA tests in order to "clear" Ross. If that happened and the lab tests came back negative, does anyone honestly believe that Morford would be avowing Ross
definitely wasn't Zodiac
because his was assuredly tested against the Zodiac's DNA?!
'Member authentic Zodiac DNA?
Yeah, I 'member!
'Member Sullivan?
Oh, I 'member!
'Member widow's peak?
Yeah, I 'member! That was fantastic.
'Member 'Moe' Morford, 'Larry' Butterfield and 'Curly' Voigt?
Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk, I 'member!
'Member Kowakian monkey-lizards
Hella sure I 'member!
Everyone take a screenshot of the rejoinder below for posterity's sake.
|| || || \ / / -
morfm — 9 years ago(January 21, 2017 09:50 AM)
You further prove your stupidity by beep on Ross Sullivan as a Suspect, while clinging to Allen who has been ruled out by every way imaginable. DNA, did NOT match. Prints Did NOT match. Ballistics did NOT match.
Here's what we can say for sure, Ross may not have been Zodiac, but Allen definitely wasn't Zodiac. do some research on your own, and don't believe everything you saw in the movie -
ophion1031 — 9 years ago(January 25, 2017 09:25 PM)
Hi, Morf! I agree that Ross cannot be ruled out as a suspect, but I don't think Allen can either. I just don't think that Zodiac's DNA is what is on file because I don't think he wrote the letters. I know law enforcement ruled him out, but honestly I think that is a mistake. There are so many things that point to Allen. I'm not saying that makes him guilty, because it doesn't, obviously. All I'm saying is that I don't think he should be ruled out.
-
ophion1031 — 9 years ago(January 25, 2017 10:39 PM)
@longcandle Don't include my name in any of this. If you have a problem with any of these other people, leave me out of it. I have no problem with you or anyone else, but I don't want my name in any kind of drama. I post at ZKS as well as other sites, but I'm not a follower or an ass-kisser. Leave me out of anything that doesn't involve what I am interested in - gathering information, sharing my ideas, listening to the ideas of others and really just having some good (and hopefully friendly) conversation.
-
ophion1031 — 9 years ago(January 25, 2017 10:33 PM)
Yep, I am a member at ZKS. Just because there has not been much talk on Sullivan lately means nothing to me. I do think he deserves serious consideration as a Bates suspect, though Tom's site is a ghost town anymore (good, he is a douche) and Morf's site still has a lot of activity going on. I find useful information there all the time and I am grateful to have a site to go to where there are some great researchers posting new information all the time. Now, when it comes down to any 'political' type of stuff or on the site or any group of 'flunkies', I don't even know about that because I don't care and don't even notice those type of things. For me it is all about the research. I find it fun and it helps me get through the night at work. I'm not a Sullivan guy myself, but I have to ask - Why do you have a problem with Sullivan's name being made public? He has been dead for 40 years. There are plenty of other suspects/POI's who have living family yet you don't mention anything about their names being made public. I'm just trying to figure out where you're coming from here.
-
BlimeyCharlie — 9 years ago(December 22, 2016 06:05 PM)
It's also pretty much the extent of the evidence on Arthur Leigh Allen. Sullivan seems to have been too tall to have matched the descriptions of the Zodiac, but Allen was even more dissimilar - Sullivan and Zodiac both had hair, at least.
-
longcandle — 9 years ago(December 22, 2016 09:32 PM)
Sorry. No. Allen can be placed in Vallejo Sullivan cant ever. There is a hell of a lot more circumstantial evidence against Allenmust I restate all this?evidence which continues to build
to this day
: see recent discoveries of Allens
entire
vehicle collection.
Sullivan cant even be placed driving/owning a car on the murder dates, try as his desperate proponents might to force the obese, schizophrenic Ross onto a motorbike at Lake Berryessa! -
morfm — 9 years ago(January 20, 2017 03:24 PM)
Longcanddle wrote
"Sorry. No. Allen can be placed in Vallejo Sullivan cant ever. There is a hell of a lot more circumstantial evidence against Allenmust I restate all this?evidence which continues to build to this day: see recent discoveries of Allens entire vehicle collection.
Sullivan cant even be placed driving/owning a car on the murder dates, try as his desperate proponents might to force the obese, schizophrenic Ross onto a motorbike at Lake Berryessa!"
As Ross can't be placed in Vallejo, Allen can't be placed in the Riverside Library where Zodiac's writing was linked,but Ross can be, and he was there,in fact,hes the ONLY suspect to ever be confirmed to be in the RCC Library where Zodiac's writing was found -
BlimeyCharlie — 9 years ago(January 25, 2017 09:05 PM)
Good point, morfm.
When you look at it all, Ross Sullivan really does make for a very telling suspect in the Zodiac case. Although his height does give me some pause for thought, there really is enough in there (in particular, his connection to the Bates murder at Riverside), to make me think he hasn't yet truly been ruled out in every way he could be.
And more to the point, I reckon he makes a more viable suspect (at least as of now) than Arthur Leigh Allen ever did, even prior to the introduction of DNA evidence. The fact that you can find some individuals (like longcandle, for example) constantly flogging a dead horse of a suspect who was exonerated long ago, doesn't mean that those theorists actually have anything helpful to add to the case.
Hopefully, this case will one day be solved - and if and when that happens, charlatans like Robert Graysmith, Gareth Penn, Blaine Blaine and Raymond Grant will have a lot to answer for. -
longcandle — 9 years ago(January 26, 2017 07:27 AM)
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/16/62/2e/16622ed640a1ceb9b5525077cce37249.jpg
but Ross can be, and he was there,in fact,hes the ONLY suspect to ever be confirmed to be in the RCC Library where Zodiac's writing was found
Did every body catch that? Mr. Morford is fond of making specious, convoluted statements like this in order to deceive people into thinking that on the evening of the murder, Ross Sullivan was at RCC campus
let alone, in and around the college library
.
and he was there,in fact
No. One more inconvenient truth for Morford, et al.
In fact
, there is absolutely NO evidence and NO witness testimony to establish that Ross Sullivan was anywhere near RCC on the evening of the murder: Sunday, October 30, 1966.
EDIT UPDATE:
Michael Morford, as of Jan. 30, 2017, heavily censored his YouTube videos' comments on his pet suspect, Ross Sullivan in order to remove most dissenting opinion, including posts simply requesting more evidence.
