WHO ELSE LIKES THIS MORE THAN 28 DAYS??
-
kurt7825 — 11 years ago(March 11, 2015 10:22 AM)
Weeks is better. Sequels are usually better than the original. same with technology, video games etc. newest ipad and newest Super Mario game are far better than original. people think its immature to like Sequels so they immediately hate them.
-
loki242 — 11 years ago(March 13, 2015 05:16 PM)
Bad comparison, in no way should you ever compare improving technology to sequels (ask Lucas about all his added BS, Han shot first!).
Besides the hate people had for sequels is eclipsed by their hate for remakes.
HELP AGGRAVATE THE STATUS QUO, VOTE AGAINST EVERY INCUMBENT YOU SEE ON A BALLOT. -
nzpedals — 10 years ago(August 12, 2015 04:36 PM)
Me.
Days although gripping throughout, has too many silliness scenes, starting with the first!! see my review for some of the others.
http://www.imdb.com/board/10289043/reviews-1584it's a whole lot harder to shine. than undermine.
-
DeadandBuried81 — 10 years ago(September 23, 2015 08:44 AM)
I saw both in theaters. 28 days was great. 28 weeks was awesome. The conflict in Renners character as a sniper, just given orders to kill innocents after the infection broke out was grueling. I loved 28 weeks and have seen it dozens of times. What I like about 28 days is how threatening the infected were.
www.thecultofhorror.blogspot.com -
cassbtt — 9 years ago(October 18, 2016 07:27 PM)
Agreed, Days was an 8 and Weeks a 9.
Great start to Days, but then it lurches into the guy-wakes-up-in-a-hospital-confused scene, straight from Day of the Triffids, and I always held that against it.
Yes, it got better from there, but I liked that they spent more money on Weeks and it showed. Bigger story. -
Woodyanders — 2 years ago(July 19, 2023 12:46 AM)
I think both films are equally excellent. I totally dig the small intimate scale of the original while the second one impresses with its take-no-prisoners brutal approach to the harsh subject matter.
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.