Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Whoever's responsible for Ant-Man should clearly take a bow. If it's the entire Marvel team as well as Peyton Reed that

Whoever's responsible for Ant-Man should clearly take a bow. If it's the entire Marvel team as well as Peyton Reed that

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
49 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #32

    Hdny42 — 9 years ago(April 04, 2016 01:26 AM)

    Perhaps I am naive because I've been on IMDB just over 12-years and I was unaware of people who create so many accounts in order to have conversations with themselves. I looked at your evidence on Uber's use of this tactic, and found the evidence quite compelling.
    This brings me to 2 main points:
    1.) What is the purpose of what Uber - and I'm sure he's not the only one - was doing by creating so many accounts and having discussions on boards? While I am morally opposed to people creating faux accounts to rate up movies they like and slam those that they dislike, but why do that on the conversation boards? Is Uber trying to convince people of bogus arguments by making any readers believe that they are outnumbered and give in to peer pressure? I don't mean to brag but I'm at least a somewhat intelligent person, and I don't understand why anyone would create dummy acounts for any reason outside of rating up or down films/shows they love or hate, respectively. The sheer amount of time it must take to create and operate so many accounts is baffling to me and, while I'm no shrink, I think the kind of person who holds public conversations with him/herself is devious, deranged, and pitiful.
    2.) How did you identify and expose Uber's work? I didn't go over all of your links, but what I did take a look at was pretty damning stuff. I think it must ALSO take a good amount of time to expose such a productive fraud as this particular troll is. I'm happy you and others have spotted 'Uber,' in many (though, as you have pointed out yourself, the troll likely has a good deal MORE dummy accounts than those you've spotted) of his/her guises, but I hope for your own sake that you've not put TOO much time exposing this toolbox for who and what he/she is. That said, I feel like you (along with a few others I saw in these threads performed an IMDB community service.
    So well done!
    I'd love to stay and chatbut I'm not going to.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #33

      McGrit — 10 years ago(October 14, 2015 08:13 PM)

      Too bad the same can't be said of TV.
      Prime-time broadcast ratings are still in decline even counting delayed views from DVRs and video on demand.Some individual shows display strength with the delayed viewings, but overall, prime-time premiere week (counting seven days of recorded viewing and four days of on-demand) fell 9% to 9.1M viewers on average.The brunt of viewer declines has fallen on ABC (9.2M average, down 11% from 10.3M) and Fox (5.7M average, down 15% from 6.8M).NBC fell 12% (10.7M average, down from 12.1M) and CBS benefiting from a very strong NFL lead-in slipped 2% to 13.1M from 13.2M.
      Those numbers are staggering.
      "A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man."

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #34

        billbrown7071 — 10 years ago(October 15, 2015 12:39 PM)

        Too bad the same can't be said of TV.
        Prime-time broadcast ratings are still in decline even counting delayed views from DVRs and video on demand.Some individual shows display strength with the delayed viewings, but overall, prime-time premiere week (counting seven days of recorded viewing and four days of on-demand) fell 9% to 9.1M viewers on average.The brunt of viewer declines has fallen on ABC (9.2M average, down 11% from 10.3M) and Fox (5.7M average, down 15% from 6.8M).NBC fell 12% (10.7M average, down from 12.1M) and CBS benefiting from a very strong NFL lead-in slipped 2% to 13.1M from 13.2M.
        Those numbers are staggering.
        lol wouldn't "Bump" have been a lot easier Uber.
        leemall-"Paul Walkers Death Had Zero Impact On F7's Hype And Box Office Results"

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #35

          assman200 — 9 years ago(May 20, 2016 12:55 PM)

          Agents of SHIELD has a great finish to season three. Now that they are moving away from Inhumans, I think even better days are ahead.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #36

            Dash1969 — 10 years ago(November 05, 2015 09:53 PM)

            Praise be but this is still true.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #37

              ScottBang — 10 years ago(November 12, 2015 09:44 PM)

              Again, back when there was only Burton's Batman, this idea would have been crazy talk. Yet, here we are and a sequel to Ant-Man is on the way AFTER we see Captain America rake in a billion dollars next year alone.
              WOW.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #38

                IMDb User

                This message has been deleted.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #39

                  nddostal — 10 years ago(November 17, 2015 02:52 PM)

                  its pretty middling actually. The effects are cool and the action in second half are awesome, but that's it. No heart like in other Marvel outings. Acting and writing are so-so.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #40

                    Marvelouis — 10 years ago(December 10, 2015 07:36 AM)

                    Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #41

                      IMDb User

                      This message has been deleted.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #42

                        sacflyzone — 10 years ago(March 31, 2016 05:28 PM)

                        Ant-Man being at 80% over on RT while Batman v Synderman is lucky to hold on to 29% does make me smile.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #43

                          IMDb User

                          This message has been deleted.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #44

                            ba_bam_bam — 9 years ago(June 25, 2016 12:45 PM)

                            Will the WB even survive more of these awkward bombs? DC is in real trouble.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #45

                              StarkTech — 9 years ago(August 25, 2016 07:03 PM)

                              The DCEU is all bed wetting and pants pooping at this point. It's like crapping down the isle at Lowe's and never looking back.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #46

                                Uberiffic — 9 years ago(October 11, 2016 04:42 PM)

                                We can look back and laugh, however.
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gCBiJ3QJnk&feature=player_embedded

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  fgadmin
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #47

                                  IMDb User

                                  This message has been deleted.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    fgadmin
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #48

                                    manchof1 — 9 years ago(January 25, 2017 11:52 PM)

                                    It isn't and not by a longshot, this film was extremely corny and generic and has already been forgotten about.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • F Offline
                                      F Offline
                                      fgadmin
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #49

                                      justanicknamed — 9 years ago(January 26, 2017 12:23 PM)

                                      Very true! That is why he was in CA:CW and why there is a sequel being made.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0

                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups