Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Whoever's responsible for Ant-Man should clearly take a bow. If it's the entire Marvel team as well as Peyton Reed that

Whoever's responsible for Ant-Man should clearly take a bow. If it's the entire Marvel team as well as Peyton Reed that

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
49 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #39

    nddostal — 10 years ago(November 17, 2015 02:52 PM)

    its pretty middling actually. The effects are cool and the action in second half are awesome, but that's it. No heart like in other Marvel outings. Acting and writing are so-so.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #40

      Marvelouis — 10 years ago(December 10, 2015 07:36 AM)

      Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #41

        IMDb User

        This message has been deleted.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #42

          sacflyzone — 10 years ago(March 31, 2016 05:28 PM)

          Ant-Man being at 80% over on RT while Batman v Synderman is lucky to hold on to 29% does make me smile.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #43

            IMDb User

            This message has been deleted.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #44

              ba_bam_bam — 9 years ago(June 25, 2016 12:45 PM)

              Will the WB even survive more of these awkward bombs? DC is in real trouble.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #45

                StarkTech — 9 years ago(August 25, 2016 07:03 PM)

                The DCEU is all bed wetting and pants pooping at this point. It's like crapping down the isle at Lowe's and never looking back.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #46

                  Uberiffic — 9 years ago(October 11, 2016 04:42 PM)

                  We can look back and laugh, however.
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gCBiJ3QJnk&feature=player_embedded

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #47

                    IMDb User

                    This message has been deleted.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #48

                      manchof1 — 9 years ago(January 25, 2017 11:52 PM)

                      It isn't and not by a longshot, this film was extremely corny and generic and has already been forgotten about.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #49

                        justanicknamed — 9 years ago(January 26, 2017 12:23 PM)

                        Very true! That is why he was in CA:CW and why there is a sequel being made.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0

                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups