Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. 7/10? No foocking way

7/10? No foocking way

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
50 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    Bioweapon — 16 years ago(January 24, 2010 11:12 PM)

    yeah, well avatar got 8.6
    I put a 5 on this one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      jhhlg1 — 16 years ago(January 29, 2010 07:32 PM)

      "You have to realize that an 8 is a good enough rating to get into the top 250 on imdb.
      Which this movie is clearly not.
      5 or 6 would be good."
      Well in some people's opinion this movie would be on the top 250. To be honest, I thought movie was good, not great. However, if I had to compile a list of my 250 favorite movies of all time, this movie would probably find a spot on that list somewhere. So no it's not that weird that someone would give this an 8, based on THEIR opinion. Also, if you look at it on the way of like grading, there are only 4 movies on all of imdb that have a 9, which would technically be like an "A" movie, that's pretty harsh don't you think? Only 4 movies in the entire world deserve to be considered as an "A" rated movie? Let people be entitled to what they think a movie deserves.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        IMDb User

        This message has been deleted.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          guybland-1 — 15 years ago(September 27, 2010 08:54 AM)

          Sarah Roemer is a 10. The movie? A 5, at best.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            CBikle — 16 years ago(January 30, 2010 10:24 PM)

            It's an entertaining but dumb movie.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              Thehoff57 — 16 years ago(January 31, 2010 08:58 AM)

              well said

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                IMDb User

                This message has been deleted.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  IMDb User

                  This message has been deleted.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    IMDb User

                    This message has been deleted.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      TemporaryAgent — 14 years ago(April 10, 2011 10:49 PM)

                      You're a joke.
                      It should be closer to a 2/10.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #21

                        moviecroc — 15 years ago(May 21, 2010 11:26 AM)

                        it may surprise you, but there are people out there that like this movie. and judging by the rating, there are a lot.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #22

                          Bml-93 — 15 years ago(May 25, 2010 02:36 PM)

                          7,5-8 sounds more right for me. I gave it an 8.
                          I want to play a game.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #23

                            scabab — 15 years ago(June 01, 2010 06:05 PM)

                            It was a enjoyable thriller, its a entertainers film from start to finish, a few laughs, a few shocks, good acting.
                            Its different to your typical thriller that takes itself seriously and youve seen it all before.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #24

                              AlphAndrA — 13 years ago(November 21, 2012 11:36 AM)

                              Best answer!!!
                              I totally agree with you.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #25

                                daniellawhead — 15 years ago(June 17, 2010 02:07 PM)

                                3 out of 10. Maybe.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  fgadmin
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #26

                                  whowhatwhy — 15 years ago(July 03, 2010 06:03 PM)

                                  you retards take ratings way to personally, the majority of peeps liked it and you didn't, who gives a ****.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    fgadmin
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #27

                                    TemporaryAgent — 14 years ago(April 10, 2011 10:49 PM)

                                    You give a ****.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • F Offline
                                      F Offline
                                      fgadmin
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #28

                                      IMDb User

                                      This message has been deleted.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • F Offline
                                        F Offline
                                        fgadmin
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #29

                                        IMDb User

                                        This message has been deleted.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • F Offline
                                          F Offline
                                          fgadmin
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #30

                                          damerman58 — 15 years ago(December 17, 2010 07:13 PM)

                                          The beginning of the movie sets up the whole thing for failure. One crash would definitely have been enough for a sad moment, two made it hilarious. Laughable "acting", the "suspense" was short lived and unimpressive and took WAY to long to get to while the whole teen spying/pathetic "love story" played out. Fine choice of bodies for the neighborhood girl though I must say - body can get a 7, movie gets a 4.5.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups