Hello everybody,
-
zwixxx — 16 years ago(October 27, 2009 03:50 PM)
I switched over for the whole rack duration so thankfully I don't have no lingering images. At the mention of rack I immediately thought - stretch, ow!!, stretch, argghhh!, stretch, crunch 'n' snap, bleeergh!, splatter, . drip . drip . drip - so lunged for the remote.
Guess I must be getting old. -
jtchick — 16 years ago(October 30, 2009 12:37 PM)
The rack was supposed to be emotional. The man was being crucified for what he did. And he was forviven but not in time and the man who chose not to set him free had to deal with that for the rest of his life; however short a time that might have been.
-
beckeis — 16 years ago(December 26, 2009 08:44 PM)
And it wasn't as if the guy wasn't emotionally tortured in the first place for having accidentally killed the boy. It was an accident and it was clearly shown that he was crying and devastated by what he had done. He did not deserve to be put in that rack, with his fate being decided by a man who could not forgive (even if he eventually did when it was too late).
-
ruminerpianogrl — 16 years ago(February 21, 2010 09:38 AM)
I felt so bad for that guy. You're right, you could tell his life was changed entirely when he killed the boy. He didn't need to endure such a horribly, gruesome death. But nobody answered the OP's other question: do you think there was a place for the key to fit in?
-What does it matter?
-It matters! "What does it matter"? I wanna know! -
sugarlullaby-1 — 16 years ago(March 06, 2010 08:24 PM)
I also felt bad for the guy. I think the boy dying was the black guy's fault as much as it was the father's fault. In the brief flash back in the middle of the movie, you see that the kid got away from his father and rode right into the street and the dude hits the kid. With the guy being drunk, he probably didn't have the mental capacity to react in time to stop. But, with that being said, the father should have been watching the kid more closely, and kid shouldn't have darted into the street like that. So the kid dying was not all the black guy's fault, it was just a series of unfortunate events, carelessnes, and bad luck.
-
Princess_Of_SAW — 15 years ago(January 14, 2011 06:45 PM)
yes it was, he was driving drunk, and in a residential area so he shouldn't have been going so fast that he killed the kid.
i felt nothing when the black guy died, i would not have even tried to save him.and even if the judge said i'd be an accomplice, i'd just say 'fvck you, you save him then'
SAW VII Board Prez
Killjoy Perilous Pixie
Team Hoffman -
forthesafetyofpuppies — 16 years ago(March 25, 2010 10:50 PM)
Aye, it's the only real look-away point in the series for me. Not so much the Exorcist-twist of the neck - because that's killing him and providing relief - but the arms and legs. Eek. Plus, the actor does a grand job of conveying the horror.
The only other moment is Straum's arm snap when the room closes in on him Temple Of Doom style in Saw 5. -
ianmitchell-45214 — 10 years ago(September 06, 2015 12:40 PM)
I gotta admit, quite a few of the traps throughout the series made me squirm, sweat and look the other way.
I remember the torture rack scene all too well. Yeesh, talk about traumatising. It didn't help that the judge had previously been in an equally uncomfortable trap beforehand. Seeing the judge tied down by the neck while pig guts fill up over him is an awful way to go.
The other saw films all had at least one trap that managed to make me feel very uncomfortable. The first Saw had the dentist chair and the reverse bear trap. I've rewatched the film not long ago and the dentist chair no longer works on me but first time around I was horrified.
The 2nd Saw film had that man in the furnacey thing, I think. Didn't like that one at all.
The 4th one and 5th one had a few too, which were either gross or horrible to imagine being in. One of them had that cop with the water box on his head. I vaguely remember that part with the same cop being crushed in a room with enclosing walls. Ugh! Never in any other films have we ever seen that trap work on someone (except for maybe 13 ghosts).
I can't remember which one but the blonde woman in he hair trap made me very uncomfortable.
Also, one of the saw films had 5 or 6 people wake up in a room with a noose around their neck. They had to smash open a glass box or lose their head. The woman that doesn't make it really looked like she was genuinely panicking for her life. I hate that part.
The Saw franchise gets a lot of criticism from people but the films worked on me. At least one elaborate trap lingered in my head afterwards. Especially the torture rack in Saw 3. -
filmbuff1974 — 15 years ago(June 22, 2010 01:46 PM)
Without a doubt the most repulsive and cruelest torture device in the whole franchise. Amanda must have thought up that one!
If you love and support Michael Jackson 100%, copy & paste this into your signature. We love MJ! -
YouFightLikeACow — 15 years ago(June 30, 2010 08:38 AM)
This trap, and for some reason the Pendulum trap in Saw V, are the only traps that I have trouble watching.
How about a magic trick? - The Joker
All hail Shyamalan, Nolan, W. Smith, Z. Deschanel, R. Byrne -
-
Mechan1calAn1mal — 15 years ago(August 08, 2010 03:51 AM)
Interesting topic. Yes, I felt exactly the same way and my dumbass went to see this IN THE THEATER BY MYSELF (except a handful of random moviegoers) because everyone else was either working or doing something else that day. Movies don't tend to bother me but this one was disturbing. It's the only one I won't watch anymore and it pisses me off because it's still a good story.
We're not some California tofu-eatin Nordic-trackin freaks who wanna live past 50!