Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Misrepresentation of Christians

Misrepresentation of Christians

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
50 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #35

    pappa-b-bear — 9 years ago(December 26, 2016 03:23 PM)

    Yes random chance is irrational. Believing all this is a random eventuality is like believing a monkey could write a coherent novel if he bangs on a keyboard long enough. It's illogical. The perpetual nature of life and the nature of code and complex systems is evidence (not proof) of intelligent design. If you were intellectually honest, you'd see that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #36

      desepticon — 9 years ago(January 06, 2017 12:08 AM)

      You display an ill-conceived notion of evolution. Evolution is far from random.
      Mutations
      are random; however, natural selection (and myriad other processes like sexual selection) are decidedly not random. If a random mutation produces a fitness (reproductive) benefit, those mutations propagate throughout a species. If they are deleterious (decrease reproductive success), they are winnowed from the gene pool. Again, this is not a random process.
      If you wish to learn more about what evolution is actually about you really should pick up any number of books that are available for laymen. You are merely attacking a straw man with your nonsense about randomness.
      My brother was eaten by wolves on the CT Turnpike

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #37

        pappa-b-bear — 9 years ago(January 09, 2017 06:49 AM)

        I never stated evolution was random I wasn't even talking about evolution at all. I was talking about the theory that the first living cell came from random eventuality of conditions. Do you understand now?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #38

          desepticon — 9 years ago(January 17, 2017 07:54 AM)

          Your reckoning of probability goes down quite a bit when things are happening on a planet-wide scale over billions of years.
          My brother was eaten by wolves on the CT Turnpike

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #39

            therefdotcom — 9 years ago(December 26, 2016 02:03 PM)

            but the thought that unlimited fantastillions of events per microsecond happen by design seems rational to you?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #40

              IMDb User

              This message has been deleted.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #41

                kubrickation — 9 years ago(September 01, 2016 04:52 PM)

                Christ would not ask for human sacrifice to appease a demon, nor would He demand a child sacrifice.
                Have you actually read the Bible? Cause God does exactly this on multiple occasions.
                Hell is other people
                -Sartre

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #42

                  pappa-b-bear — 9 years ago(September 01, 2016 05:53 PM)

                  You don't seem very theologically educated. This person said Christ didn't demand such sacrifice. Please provide one single instance where he did.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #43

                    kubrickation — 9 years ago(October 15, 2016 03:56 PM)

                    So God and Christ aren't one and the same?
                    Your ideology is ridiculously confusing. No, not confusing-that would imply there was something of substance to understand. It's just plain ridiculous.
                    Hell is other people
                    -Sartre

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #44

                      pappa-b-bear — 9 years ago(January 09, 2017 06:45 AM)

                      God required a sacrifice for man's sin which he later provided himself. Yeah it's complex in ways.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #45

                        pappa-b-bear — 9 years ago(January 09, 2017 06:46 AM)

                        But he never required human sacrifice. The instance with Abraham was to show him that he had faith.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #46

                          IMDb User

                          This message has been deleted.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #47

                            fountaincap — 9 years ago(August 23, 2016 05:13 PM)

                            It's Hollywood. Not limited to Stephen King. The same kind of negative portrayal of Muslims or Jews would be denounced as "racism". It's getting quite annoying. I am in no way suggesting that Christianity is above-criticism or ridicule (I'm an atheist), but the double-standard that Hollywood has for the portrayal of religions shows a clear bias.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #48

                              Minus_The_Beer — 9 years ago(August 29, 2016 08:20 AM)

                              Who says she's representative of all Christians? Seemed kind of clear to me that she was insane, with or without the faith.
                              If anything, she was more of a fanatic/cult-type. Doesn't necessarily mean the film was bashing Christianity. Try harder to find something to be offended by.
                              Anyone here mentions Hotel California dies before the first line clears his lips.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #49

                                kubrickation — 9 years ago(September 01, 2016 04:49 PM)

                                No, religious people are typically pretty stupid and irritating. I think she got it right.
                                Hell is other people
                                -Sartre

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  fgadmin
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #50

                                  pappa-b-bear — 9 years ago(September 01, 2016 05:49 PM)

                                  There are scientists and academics who are Christians far more educated and successful than you'll ever be. Your mindset is bigoted and idiotic.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0

                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups