He sold a young girl to a family whom he knew hated his own and nothing else about them. The girl's mother was adamant a
-
CheruthCutestoryII — 9 years ago(January 13, 2017 09:06 AM)
He killed someone who declared war on him in a way that prevented needless slaughter of his own men. He was right to do what he did to Robb, easily the most selfish character in the entire series.
Tywin was a villain but most of his deaths weren't just selfish the way Tyrion's was.
Most people thought I was a hero for killing Lydia's parrot. -
vjfoogie — 9 years ago(January 13, 2017 09:35 AM)
Tywin had no intention of executing Tyrion until the TBC was lost. He had every intention to send him to the wall. Most of your other points I sort of agree with though.
We can blame the indirect or direct blame game all we want, but Tywin's death did directly led to a lot of bad stuff. -
TremendouslyThirsty — 9 years ago(January 13, 2017 10:02 AM)
Regardless if he did or didn't have the intention of killing him, he knew Tyrion was innocent and still let Cersei run a
farce of a trial. Also, Tyrion had no way of knowing his father wouldn't do it. He had been fed up with his family's bullish-t for years, and acted acted upon those feelings. -
vjfoogie — 9 years ago(January 13, 2017 10:31 AM)
I don't disagree with Tyrions actions, but Jaime did tell him that he had taken care of it. I understand why he did what he did during he trial, but he should have listened to Jaime.
Tywin probably didn't know if he had killed the king or not. I believe the result would have been the same either way though. -
vjfoogie — 9 years ago(January 13, 2017 10:34 AM)
Genocide? Bran didn't kill them.also, we don't really know if that was the last CotF. If you want to play the indirect game, blame Bloodraven for forcing the path Bran took to make these events happen.
I do agree if Bran just walks across the wall without thinking about the NK mark, I will be really upset. They better have a ranger find him and drag him across the wall against his will or something. -
willsons-2 — 9 years ago(January 13, 2017 04:28 PM)
That hardly qualifies as a "villain". Not by a longshot. Perhaps it demonstrates a character flaw or maybe just youth.
To my mind a villain is someone who consciously sets out to hurt others for their own benefit or at least are indifferent to how their actions might adversely affect others. a
By that definition Cersei and Littlefinger are the strongest contenders for the title of "Villain".
"I care about the law. It's justice I don't give a toss about."
Cleaver Greene -
Leo_ofRedKeep — 9 years ago(January 13, 2017 06:12 PM)
To my mind a villain is someone who consciously sets out to hurt others for their own benefit or at least are indifferent to how their actions might adversely affect others.
By that definition Cersei and Littlefinger are the strongest contenders for the title of "Villain".
I'll agree on Littlefinger who clearly sets disruptive things in motion to advance his position but definitely not for Cersei who acts in self-preservation.
Long may she reign
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com:443/data.filmboards/images/upload/BxJJSJZ.jpg
