Environmentalists hate homo sapiens
-
black_wolf_1970 — 15 years ago(July 14, 2010 10:06 PM)
Here is a test for you, this was done by 3 universities. They made a scaled sealed eco-system, started a warming trend guess what happened at a certain point part continued to climb in temp, others section grew colder then they had arranged it to be at the start of the experiment. One group did a reverse in that they started cold, went colder, then it warmed to a stable point, but then they trough in climate effectors such as CO2, H2SO4, and so on it follwed the same trend as the others warm over all, then warmer areas and cooler areas till a point went it went all warm then freeze over. check it your self..
"NOTHING IS FORGOTTEN, NOTHING IS EVER FORGOTTEN" ROBIN (ROBIN HOOD) OF LOXLEY
The wolf -
black_wolf_1970 — 15 years ago(July 14, 2010 09:56 PM)
Yeah and I would wonder if you would feel that way if say a species of ant was found that grew a fungus that could cure cancer but oops, we killed it off because it was just and ant. I would also bet you the would love to see the wolf, panther, bear populations killed off, but then we would have an onslaught of mice, rats, rabbits etc that would turn the human food supply into there own and millions of people would die
"NOTHING IS FORGOTTEN, NOTHING IS EVER FORGOTTEN" ROBIN (ROBIN HOOD) OF LOXLEY
The wolf -
werecow2003 — 16 years ago(November 13, 2009 06:54 PM)
"I'm going to release a deadly plague that will kills millions of human beings." That's just great. I'm glad you love bugs more than people.
.
The environmentalists hate homo sapiens.
For those of you who didn't realize this, Val Kilmer is actually an actor and had no intention of killing off homo sapiens in real life. In fact, ecologists (and environmentalists) are typically very keen on warning us of the disasters that will eventually strike us in the long term when we mess with ecosystems without thinking. It's not their fault that most of the public is thick as concrete when it comes to science. Or selfish as crap when money's involved, for that matter. But, here's just a thought, maybe the scientists who have studied climate for 3 or 4 decades actually know bit more about this topic than the people who are into money and politics for a living. Maybe you should actually think about what they have to say.
The recent massive stream of ignorance-is-bliss global warming deniers, on the other hand, seems very keen on steering us into the direction of any number of major catastrophes without further thought. In case you missed this, it's not just the environmentalists that acknowledge man-made global warming anymore. Practically all climatologists agree that it is happening, whether they care or not. So don't turn it into a lefty-righty debate, and don't take the word of politicians -on either side of the debate- who want to tell you what is going on. Look at the actual, independently conducted science, done by people who know the field, and see for yourself. For all practical purposes, it could not be any clearer that we are having an impact. Whether you think that's bad is another matter, and one which is up for debate if you can present sound reasons why it may not be.
Oh, and also, global warming has very little to do with guppy's, so your example does not apply.
So, in summary, grow the uck up, get over your anti-environmental biases, educate yourself on the topic and on science in general, and look at the actual evidence before you start typing bull about this topic again, pretty please. -
childer_orion700 — 15 years ago(June 22, 2010 09:23 PM)
Animals don't wage nuclear war on eachother. Animals don't blow mountain tops clean off to get at the oil underneath all so people can continue to drive big SUVs. Animals don't gush tons of oil into the ocean. Is it really so strange that someone would prefer animals over humans? It's not a mental disorder, waging an illegal war and killing thousands all in the name of your religion, now that is a mental disorder!
And also, the irrigation pumps were not turned down because of the guppy, they were turned down because the industrial farmers were using far too much water on their pesticide-ridden crops and the Colorado River is already over irrigated and drying up! -
childer_orion700 — 15 years ago(June 22, 2010 09:26 PM)
And incase you didn't realise, if we don't have the Earth, we have nowhere to live! It's the only one we've got, yet we live like we have many more to spare. Is it really so mind blowing that someone would want to help our planet?
-
zwooven — 15 years ago(October 30, 2010 08:46 AM)
The environmentalists hate homo sapiens.
Yes. Yes they do.
The parts of the movie that support your preconceived partisan political views are empirical evidence that those views are accurate depictions of reality. The parts of the movie that conflict with them are, of course, complete hogwash. -