Danielle Harris or Tamara Feldman?
-
The_King_of_Cool — 14 years ago(May 17, 2011 10:03 PM)
Talent means nothing in Hollywood.
Can you honestly say someone like Freddie Prinze Jr is a talented actor? For a while in the late 90s he had success.
Brining up her lack of work is poitnless and way off base for why she has or hasn't had a career.
Your other reasons however are totally different and probably correct.
Darling, you can't rape a townie. -
hard2getkidd — 14 years ago(August 07, 2011 06:27 PM)
Tough Choicebut my vote is to DANIELLE , I normally hate when a role is recast with a different actor but Dani held her own , I love Tamara in the first but The Character was more developed in part 2 and Danielle made it hers .
-
ThoseLittleRabbits — 14 years ago(September 25, 2011 04:25 AM)
tarma was annoyin as hell. i was half hoping she would die in tha first. danielle iz way more entertaining
http://www.myspace.com/450983229
them haterz can't tell me nothin -
dac287 — 14 years ago(September 26, 2011 12:27 AM)
I just saw this on Cinemax and kind of giggle at seeing so many people call the first one "a legend" or a classic. The first movie was B-movie schlock and it enjoyed and reveled in it. The second one was more of the same. I kind of preferred the second one just because Zombie had a major role in it and his scheming with the children who killed the monster as adults gave the film a secondary plot that seemed interesting.
All this is a meandering way of being surprised so many people thought Tamara was so much better. They're pretty equal, IMO. However, the character (from what I remember as it's been a year or two since I saw the first one and I haven't thought about it in about as long) was much better written in the second movie. She annoyed me to no end in the first film and here she had the best, if not very clever, line of the movie when she comes back with the shotgun and yells "beep YOU" to the whole monster coming back at the end scare.
For that reason, I'll vote for the latter. The performances were equal, but despite no major chase scene, the sequel was much more clever in its writing, in my opinion. -
oddball_oddity-1 — 14 years ago(October 21, 2011 09:23 PM)
Honestly, I wish it had been Danielle Harris from the start. Tamara Feldman was alright, but I didn't particularly want the sequel featuring her character. She didn't do much for me.
Heck, you didn't see Harris go through what Feldman did, and I felt more sympathy for Harris recalling it than actually seeing Feldman go through it. -
metabrillance12 — 13 years ago(May 28, 2012 06:31 PM)
They are even in terms of acting ability. The Hatchet movies are intentionally cheesy and wonderfully tongue-in-cheek so it doesn't matter how good they are at acting. The movies are fairly even as well. I liked the original a bit better but the second one was really good too.
Personally, I love Danielle Harris (I'm a Halloween fanboy), and she is so damn cute. So I didn't mind when I heard she was going to be in this.
My only gripe is I hate when franchises recast roles. I just wish they kept Feldman for easier continuity between the films. Not a big deal though. I love Harris. -
Bunnyluv0012 — 12 years ago(June 05, 2013 07:00 PM)
Very simple question, Tamara Feldman
FACE BOOK
https://www.facebook.com/lynn.ann.9?ref=tn_tnmn -
plutomani — 10 years ago(June 14, 2015 03:04 PM)
Eh, it's just like with the debate about which movie you prefer; I have no strong opinions, because I enjoyed the heck out of this triology no matter who played Marybeth. I think both Tamara and Danielle did well.
Actress or acting-abilities were not what got me interested in
Hatchet
in the first place. It was blood, guts, gore, intestines, decapitations, disembowelment, splattered brains, amputated limbs, dangling eyeballs, ripped skin, pulverized bodies, crushed skulls, you get the drill