Sienna Miller
-
SamanthaWho88 — 15 years ago(August 21, 2010 11:03 AM)
It was an awful shoot, they really could get nothing out of her. The pictures looked terrible and unprofessional, and Miller herself was self important, boring and uncharismatic throughout.
This film should be renamed "Everybody Hates Sienna Miller"! -
roretz — 15 years ago(August 28, 2010 05:39 AM)
she sees nothing in Miller but celebrity. It would sell. Wintour ain't got a vision, shes got a feel, a feel for the pulse of ephemeral Celebutante zeitgeists. Its rather superfulous.. a magazine people will pile up, and then will have to throw out. Ive seen piles of old issues on my street and exactly the same in New york. You can't complain about Miller, or even good taste. Its all executed in the best possible (passable) taste as of & for the moment. So much can be "shot" that most of it is bound to be as ephemeral as the worlds daily papers. Make a scrapbook of your favourite bits or else buy a wharehouse and hoard ever-mounting back issues.
-
firstwinsgop — 14 years ago(August 20, 2011 10:31 PM)
Yes, she was bad, and Testino didn't do a good job shooting it either. That was the whole point. Miller and Testino's lackluster photoshoot represented the first real crisis of the film and ratcheted up the tension, which only got more intense when Anna nixes the color blocking shoot just a day before they go to press. This sets up the dramatic conclusion where Grace, Patrick Demarchelier, and Caroline Trentini (with a little help from the documentary cameraman himself)are forced to come through with a brilliant last second shoot to save the day.
-
howtragic — 14 years ago(February 19, 2012 07:03 AM)
I thought the color block shoot was trite and uninteresting. We have seen that so many times before. Sienna Miller's slicked back hair looked terrible. It was not fashionable nor interesting. I also found Testino's "vision" to be really lame. We have seen it so many times before - the "Roman Holiday" thing. I loved the documentary because it just showed how NOT very good most of these people are.
-
HollyHop — 13 years ago(May 26, 2012 05:46 AM)
Didn't their hairstylist have the talent to give her hair volume? I have thin hair like Sienna (Her describing her hair as too thick was hilarious) and I easily put waves, curls and volume in it everyday just by using a roll brush hair dryer.
That tiny knot they "styled" her hair up to at the end was sad to look at.
Her posture in those pictures were terrible too, why on earth did she bend forward like that?
Don't tell me, it's no use to me. Tell yourself if you want to but don't tell me. -
kaskait — 13 years ago(August 18, 2012 02:57 PM)
They wanted to give her a pixie haircut like the one Jean Seberg wore in "Breathless". But she didn't want to cut her hair. Which, I think, made them lose enthusiasm for her cover shoot in Vogue.
Maybe she should have cut her hair. I mean, where is Sienna Miller now? Really? She should have looked upon the Vogue shoot as a career move not a perk. -
bannna — 13 years ago(January 03, 2013 03:27 PM)
I agree the whole shot was crap, but actually felt bad for Sienna being criticised so much for her hair, then teeth etc by all of them. What we didn't hear was why did Anna choose her on the first place. Sienna is not such a huge celebrity to justify cover page solely for that reason, so Anna must have seen something positive in her originally.