I can't believe I watched the whole thing
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Under the Skin
crusty50 — 10 years ago(August 31, 2015 07:16 AM)
I can't believe I watched the whole thing
What the hell was this all about? The synopsis says that she seduces menI never saw any seduction, just a bunch of disjointed scenes tied together with Scarlett's giant ass (jeez, is she doing the kardashian thing?). I never realized before this film that she walks as if she has a stick up her butt.
Please someone tell meis she supposed to be an alien or something? At least with the species series you were able to understand what the alien chick was after no matter how twisted it was. Reminds me of some of Godard's crap movies -10/10 -
logan-duk-dong — 10 years ago(August 31, 2015 02:52 PM)
She's not an alien. She's just a black woman with no vagina who wears white people suits made by Buffalo Bill from Silence of the Lambs. I think we can all agree that his work has improved significantly since 1991
Oh, and Scarlett was just a marketing ploy to sucker people in to watching this piece of garbage.
Producer #1:
How in the world are we going to get people to watch Glazer's goofy movie about deformed men learning to swim?
Producer #2:
We'll add a naked chick.
Producer #1:
Awesome, brah! -
exaybachay84 — 9 years ago(December 22, 2016 06:18 PM)
She's not an alien. She's just a black woman with no vagina who wears white people suits made by Buffalo Bill from Silence of the Lambs. I think we can all agree that his work has improved significantly since 1991
Oh, and Scarlett was just a marketing ploy to sucker people in to watching this piece of garbage.
Producer #1: How in the world are we going to get people to watch Glazer's goofy movie about deformed men learning to swim?
Producer #2: We'll add a naked chick.
Producer #1: Awesome, brah!
While I love the movie, this is absolutely hilarious!
Do you have any tobacco? -
CorumJI — 10 years ago(December 01, 2015 05:07 PM)
"scarlett has a giant ass " https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9RVS8cjNN0
and i truly see no problem with this.
It is, unfortunately, a giant
FLABBY
ass.
I have no doubt she loses noticeable weight when playing Black Widow. Or even Lucy. She didn't bother for this flick.
The problem is, she looks markedly
mediocre
. Which is
disappointing
.
Given that the film is a surrealistic piece of junk ranking right up there with Zardoz in incomprehensibility and pointlessness, her, naked, was the only thing the film actually had going for it. And it failed on that part, too.
I got what they were going for. It was just exceptionally weird and, in the end,
utterly
pointless
.
It said nothing about humans, aliens, or any other worthy message one might derive from anything that sucked more than 90 minutes from your life There are worse films out there, but few than have or had modern-equivalent basic-level production values. -
bigjohnnyhandsome — 10 years ago(December 31, 2015 02:44 PM)
It is, unfortunately, a giant FLABBY ass.
True. Very true.
I have no doubt she loses noticeable weight when playing Black Widow. Or even Lucy. She didn't bother for this flick.
Doubt it. It looks big in those, too. Those tight clothes she wears double as an ass-corset.
The problem is, she looks markedly mediocre. Which is disappointing.
At best. I find her very unattractive. -
Drive-in567 — 10 years ago(January 18, 2016 06:00 PM)
I find her very unattractive
Not to be mean but please see an eye doctor.
http://surgerystars.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Scarlett-Johansson-breast-reduction.jpg -
visionbrett — 10 years ago(January 14, 2016 05:41 AM)
Had no problem with her ass.the problem was the movie itself. It seemed like the director just wanted to hang out with her and see her naked and made some crap film around that, even though whatever this was took 10 years. The "plot" of the film is no more than a 15 minute short and to watch the whole thing was absolutely painfully boring. This ranks as one of the worst movies I have ever seen. There are worse
made
movies for sure but to disagree with the main review - this movie is very pretentious. SPOILER:
The only redeemable things were the effects of the bones popping out and at the end, her skin coming off - again, well within a 15 minute short. -
tazmanian666 — 10 years ago(October 01, 2015 03:33 PM)
She hasn't got a 'giant' ass, she's got a great
ass and nothing like the kardishians etc
Your obviously used to looking at a guys ass!
Scarlett is a woman. Women are a different gender to men,
See
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=definition+of+woman&es_sm=122&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAWoVChMIwvnkiKaiyAIVTLoaCh38IQuF&biw=1920&bih=1085#tbm=isch&q=womans+shape
Okay, good thats sorted. I shall be asking questions next week.
In the meantime, do some revision on the following pics
http://forums.superiorpics.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/1842317/Scarlett_Johansson_Butt_Shots_ -
CorumJI — 10 years ago(December 01, 2015 05:13 PM)
Dude, it's a giant ass, and, worse, it was flabby as She looks no better than any 30# overweight hooker in some amateur porn film with all the inserts cut out.
I grasp she's not always as hot as she is in a 50 million dollar film where she's making a million bucks, but, at least, when Haley Berry decided to do a nude scene, she buffed up for it.
Combine this with the pointless and surreal elements of the film, you couldn't have made a more obvious example of "
How do we make a film that's utter and still get people to pay for it?
"
