Don't you mean the voter fraud speculations? No real evidence?
-
dbentley666 — 5 years ago(December 01, 2020 05:05 AM)
Ur not thinking clearly said...
You have a short memory. Look 3 posts up to the one that begins "The 10 minutes you are so fearful of…"
You should write out a sworn affidavit. Also, please mention your accredited university, Trump U. -
Ur not thinking clearly — 5 years ago(December 01, 2020 05:07 AM)
dbentley666 said...
You should write out a sworn affidavit. Also, please mention your accredited university, Trump U.
You should be embarrassed for yourself. But apparently you're a typical shameless liberal commie. You'll never get your Marxist utopia on this soil. -
dbentley666 — 5 years ago(December 01, 2020 05:09 AM)
Ur not thinking clearly said...
You should be embarrassed for yourself. But apparently you're a typical shameless liberal commie. You'll never get your Marxist utopia on this soil.
What's a liberal commie? At the accredited university where I teach, it is assumed that liberalism and communism are distinct, and even opposed, political systems. I suppose you went to an institution where there was Trumpism, and then all the other systems that Fox News distrusted? -
Ur not thinking clearly — 5 years ago(December 01, 2020 05:13 AM)
dbentley666 said...
What's a liberal commie? At the accredited university where I teach, it is assumed that liberalism and communism are distinct, and even opposed, political systems. I suppose you went to an institution where there was Trumpism, and then all the other systems that Fox News distrusted?
More intellectually dishonest blather. I don't know how you keep showing such idiocy while claiming to be an academic. I'm sure your colleagues would be terribly sad for you if they were here. If you even have colleagues. -
dbentley666 — 5 years ago(December 01, 2020 05:17 AM)
Ur not thinking clearly said...
More intellectually dishonest blather. I don't know how you keep showing such idiocy while claiming to be an academic. I'm sure your colleagues would be terribly sad for you if they were here. If you even have colleagues.
So you don't distinguish between political positions? You're a red-blooded American male, by goddam, and you won't have any damn pinkos spoiling the American way with their talk of abolishing private property! -
Ur not thinking clearly — 5 years ago(December 01, 2020 05:30 AM)
dbentley666 said...
So you don't distinguish between political positions? You're a red-blooded American male, by goddam, and you won't have any damn pinkos spoiling the American way with their talk of abolishing private property!
Watch the computer forensics expert's testimony in that other thread, then get back to me, fraidy cat. -
Yermom_Is_God — 5 years ago(November 30, 2020 04:26 PM)
Yeah except the places that have had the most strict measures put in place have had the highest outbreaks and deaths. You can compare places in crappy Europe where they do and don't issue these extreme guidelines and there isn't much difference. I know the TV told you to live in fear and do all this dumb **** that we've been doing for nine months now and this virus will go away, it hasn't.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
Yermom_Is_God — 5 years ago(November 30, 2020 08:13 PM)
I like when dumb **** leftist try and shout science as of they've made any real argument. These are the same type of people who would say something along the lines of "Local man who was 8 and a half months pregnant with a non-human was just killed in a hurricane caused by Trump."
You guys are radical nut bags.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
MagneticMonopole — 5 years ago(November 30, 2020 08:21 PM)
You can shut us up by citing a respected mainstream scientific source which supports your positions.
But since your positions have **** all to do with objective reality, you can't and therefore won't. -
Yermom_Is_God — 5 years ago(November 30, 2020 08:28 PM)
citing a respected mainstream
You set that up nicely, obviously that's subjective but gave you an easy out to dismiss anything that questions your terrified beta male narrative.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
MagneticMonopole — 5 years ago(November 30, 2020 08:37 PM)
Being a scientifically illiterate nutcase, it is of course part of the game to pretend you know better than scientific sources which have earned the respect of their peers by having a history of being right more often than not.
You ****ing lunatic morons think science and politics are no different. -
Yermom_Is_God — 5 years ago(November 30, 2020 09:43 PM)
You ****ing lunatic morons think science and politics are no different
Because this is how the left treats science. You sit here and tell us to believe in science and your solution to everything is to massively expand the government and strip people of their freedom, while also telling us men can be women. No, you ****ing idiots care about science, this is all political.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
Cerridwen — 5 years ago(November 30, 2020 09:33 PM)
What? Going heavy on the drink today?
I linked you directly to an article discussing scientific findings surrounding the efficacy of (mandated) social distancing procedures. Your refusal to accept reality has no bearing on its existence.
Hark! Harold the angel sings. -
Yermom_Is_God — 5 years ago(November 30, 2020 11:36 PM)
You only follow any article that will support your narrative and then pretend the science is settled, that's not how it works. The effectiveness of masks is about 50/50 within the scientific community, but obviously leftists will only call the ones who agree with them credible.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
Cerridwen — 5 years ago(November 30, 2020 11:50 PM)
The article was talking about social distancing (as enforced by mandatory lockdowns), not masks. Social distancing is 100% the most effective way to flatten a pandemic. We have to wear masks because people won't stay home. We have to be locked down because people won't social distance when they go out to frolic.
Hark! Harold the angel sings.
