Even if he is 17, which many of those things point to - he's not going to adult prison. That's only for 18 and above. He
-
PeterMarkoff — 9 years ago(October 28, 2016 02:17 PM)
so kids 15 years old should not be watching porn, but they can have actual sex? because you know she of consent in most of Europe is 15 so you can legally beep whoever you want from 15
also there is nothing illegal about watching porn, it's just illegal to sell it to people younger than 18, but if they obtain it somehow there is nothing illegal about watching it
now watching porn involving under 18 is crime i consider ridiculous and it should depend on circumstances. if 15yo shoot video of sex having with his 15yo gf which is legal then it's crazy that he can be at same time charged with child pornography despite him being one of the actors who performed acts voluntarily -
laurendorward-990-190608 — 9 years ago(November 01, 2016 01:49 AM)
Im not questioning it's legality I question it's influence on young people's minds. Its not healthy.
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/sep/10/how-porn-is-damaging-our-childrens-future-sex-lives?client=ms-android-hms-vf-gb
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sex-lies-trauma/201107/effects-porn-adolescent-boys
https://www.protectkids.com/effects/harms.htm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/violent-porn-dangers-posed-to-women/
http://www.teendrugrehabs.com/blog/youths-watch-violent-porn-sexually-aggressive/
Personally, I'd love all traces of pornography to be erased from the Internet. Its a disgusting business that uses and abuses people, but it's even more damaging to teens.
I actually have no problem with a 16 year old having sex with their partner a problem. If, both are ready and it's completely consenting -
danavenell — 9 years ago(November 01, 2016 02:09 AM)
Over the last 15 years we have seen an explosion in the availability of porn to adults and teens. Probably a thousand, maybe tens of thousands times as many people regularly watch porn compared to the 80s. If it was harmful we wold have seen a mass of problems associated with it. If it caused rapes, we would be in the middle of a rape epidemic. Yet we are not. Mass consumption of porn has not caused the problems the anti-porn brigade were convinced it causes.
-
laurendorward-990-190608 — 9 years ago(November 01, 2016 05:53 AM)
Yet there's been an increase in domestic violence..oh and in colleges and universities there's been an increase in assaults
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/uk-rape-numbers-record-high-threat-cuts-victim-support-public-health-issue-1524139
Psychologists have proven it damages kids minds. read the posts. It is a disgusting business that abuses and extorts everyone involved. -
danavenell — 9 years ago(November 01, 2016 12:53 PM)
From your link
The spike in sex crime is thought to be down to an improvement in crime recording by the police and an increase in the willingness of victims to come forward and report to the police.
Nowhere does it say increased access to porn is a factor. We live in an age where people are much more likely to report rape. Please show any evidence connecting porn to rape.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/all-about-sex/200904/does-pornography-cause-social-harm
Many people feel offended by pornography. Those who find it odious have every right to their opinion.
But some porn-haters declare that X-rated material does more than just disgust them. They contend that it contributes to significant social harm. In The Porn Trap (2008), psychotherapists Wendy and Larry Maltz assert that it's a significant factor in sexual irresponsibility and divorce.
The late feminist activist, Andrea Dworkin, argued that by depicting women as men's willing sexual playthings, porn contributes to rape. Her disciple, Robert Jensen, writes: "pornography alone doesn't make men rape[but] it may activate coercive tendencies." And porn critic Diana Russell argues that porn undermines men's inhibitions against rape and spurs some to commit it.
Strong accusations. But are they true? The advent of Internet porn provides surprising answers.
The Internet became a major force in everyday life in the late 1990s. Before then, porn was available in adult stores, through X-rated video rentals, and on some newsstands. But with the arrival of the Internet, porn availability exploded. It was just a click away 24-7 for free in tens of millions of homes and offices. In 1997, 16 percent of American adults used the Internet regularly. By 2005, the figure had quadrupled to 65 percent. The Internet has also made porn much more available to impressionable kids. How many kids, ages 10 to 17, have viewed Internet porn? According to a recent report in the journal Pediatrics, 42 percent.
If porn is a significant contributor to social harm, we would expect to see substantial increases in sexual irresponsibility, divorce, and rape since the late 1990s when the Internet suddenly made X-rated material much more available to those who might instigate sexual mayhem, overwhelmingly men.
Guess what. Since the arrival of Internet porn:- Sexual irresponsibility has declined. Standard measures include rates of abortion and sexually transmitted infections. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), since 1990, the nation's abortion rate has fallen 41 percent. The syphilis rate has plummeted 74 percent. And the gonorrhea rate has plunged 57 percent.
- Teen sex has declined. The CDC says that since 1991, the proportion of teens who have had intercourse has decreased 7 percent. Teen condom use has increased 16 percent. And the teen birth rate has fallen 33 percent.
- Divorce has declined. Since 1990, the divorce rate has decreased 23 percent.
- Rape has declined. According to the Justice Department's National Crime Victimization Survey, since 1995, the sexual assault rate has fallen 44 percent.
Why would social ills decline as porn becomes more widely available? No one knows. But the one thing porn really causes is masturbation. Internet porn keeps men at home one-handing it. As a result, they're not out in the world acting irresponsibly-or criminally.
I'm not arguing that porn is utterly harmless. Some men consume it so compulsively that it interferes with their lives. They need therapy. Some women become distraught when they discover that the men in their lives enjoy porn. They might benefit from couple therapy. And to the extent that porn is a sex educator, it teaches lovemaking all wrong. More about this in a future post.
But the evidence clearly shows that from a social welfare perspective, porn causes no measurable harm. In fact, as porn viewing has soared, rates of syphilis, gonorrhea, teen sex, teen births, divorce, and rape have all substantially declined. If Internet porn affects society, oddly enough, it looks beneficial. Perhaps mental health professionals should encourage men to view it.
Show me a report where pornography has led to an increase in domestic violence. And you can factor in the fact that 40% of victims of domestic violence are men
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2010/sep/05/men-victims-domestic-violence
Data from Home Office statistical bulletins and the British Crime Survey show that men made up about 40% of domestic violence victims each year between 2004-05 and 2008-09, the last year for which figures are available. In 2006-07 men made up 43.4% of all those who had suffered partner abuse in the previous year, which rose to 45.5% in 2007-08 but fell to 37.7% in 2008-09.
Is that down to porn?
-
laurendorward-990-190608 — 9 years ago(November 01, 2016 01:02 PM)
Im not spending my entire night posting excerts as I have better things to do but if you type it into Google you'll see that violence aagainst women, expectations boys expect off girls, low self esteem, social problems, sexual addiction, use of prostitutes etc etc are all factors of pornography. It's a disgusting business and if you are singing it's praises I suggest you take a good look in the mirror. It's filmed prostitution.
https://cyber.harvard.edu/VAW02/mod2-6.htm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11376283/Does-watching-porn-really-turn-people-into-violent-criminals.html -
danavenell — 9 years ago(November 01, 2016 01:12 PM)
Again, from your own link - do you even read them?
in the USA the worlds biggest consumer of porn rape figures have consistently fallen since 1990, from
41.2 cases per 100,000
to
25 per 100,000 in 2013
, when they fell 10.6 per cent on the previous year.
Internet porn has become massively more widespread since 1990. Women are more likely to report rape than ever. yet rape figures have consistently fallen in quite dramatic numbers (see above) since 1990. The facts are not on your side of the argument, they are on mine.
You don't like porn. So don't watch it. -
laurendorward-990-190608 — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 01:21 AM)
This isn't just about rape numpty this is about the psychological damage rape does to young minds. That doesn't just mean violence. Though, Statistically one in 5 women will be attacked in some way.And that's good is it? So in the UK alone that's 85,000 women and 12,000 men (reported)
I won't watch porn, neither would I allow a child to watch it..8 year olds watching sites like ghetto gaggers and facial abuse.yeah, great parenting.
It's abhorrent and in time I hope access to it will become far more difficult than it is now.
Quite frankly it's no better than prostitution and thinking it's perfectly acceptable for a child to watch it is disgusting. -
laurendorward-990-190608 — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 07:35 AM)
When did I ever say this to begon with? YOU started this possibly because you read my first post wrong, not saying I don't believe it isn't a major factor for sexual assault though.I said it damages young people's minds and had proof for this.
It is true that college campus attacks have risen, which kinda correlates with the age of the perpetrators and their victims.
It isn't good for teens to be watching porn. It constructs a fantasy in their heads that'll never come true, desensitises the viewer so they want something more graphic to satisfy the urges. Sexual performance is worsened. NOT to mention the effects on the actual performers.
Why go on about one thing when it's a far bigger picture -
danavenell — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 10:24 AM)
It isn't good for teens to be watching porn. It constructs a fantasy in their heads that'll never come true, desensitises the viewer so they want something more graphic to satisfy the urges. Sexual performance is worsened
EVIDENCE PLEASE. -
laurendorward-990-190608 — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 10:41 AM)
Read the posts I have put up or look it up yourself. It's not hard there's new reports constantly in the press in it.
Watch the bbc3 documentary on it with typer drew honey, or the documentary by Stacey Dooley. Read the psychiatric report (which you can download) on it.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3196809/It-induces-addiction-makes-men-hopeless-bed-discover-porn-affect-BRAIN.html
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/amp.livescience.com/52469-how-porn-affects-brains.html?client=ms-android-hms-vf-gb
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/03/14/watching-pornography-damages-mens-brains/
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5450478
This isn't even including the dangers the actual performers are in, or why they are doing it in the 1st place. Watching a documentary like hot girls wanted or Louis Theroux's weird weekends gives an insight into how messed up these people become psychologically and physically.
You seem extremely invested in pornography which leads me to believe you like it. You're better invested in finding yourself a partner than wasting your time on porn. -
danavenell — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 11:01 AM)
I have a partner thanks. We both enjoy porn. I have two exes who do porn. Both are very happy in the profession, they are natural exhibitionists. Those who find working in porn problematic should leave and find a different profession.
The Daily Mail is scare-mongering junk and cannot be trusted for any scientific objectivity. And Stacey Dooley is a moron (although one of my exes who do porn, the welsh wheelchair one, was on one of her shows).
From your Telegraph link
For the study, Dr Kuhn and her colleague Jurgen Gallinat from Charite University, also in Berlin, recruited 64 healthy men between the ages of 21 and 45 years and asked them questions about their porn-watching habits.
They also took images of the mens brains to measure volume and to see how their brains reacted to pornographic pictures.
They found noticeable differences in the men who abstained compared with those who regularly accessed sexual videos or images.
However other researchers claimed that pornography in moderation was probably not damaging.
Everything is going to be bad in excess and its probably not terrible in moderation, Dr Gregory Tau of the Columbia University
From your LiveScience link
Problem or not?
Is pornography use an unhealthy addiction that ruins men for relationships, or a healthy sexual outlet that both men and women enjoy? How people answer may affect whether they are harmed by porn. A study in the September issue of the journal Psychology of Addictive Behavior found that it was the perception of being "addicted to porn," rather than the intensity of porn use per se, that was tied with psychological distress.
And contrary to the notion that pornography fuels misogyny, men who viewed porn tended to hold more egalitarian views about women than did non-porn-using men. Frequent porn users view powerful women, working women and women who have had abortions more favorably than do other men, a study published in August in the Journal of Sex Research found.
The HuffPo article is about children watching porn. I do not believe children should be watching porn.
Now I have given you several experts who say that porn is not harmful and has not led to a rise in rapes, teenage pregnancies, and a whole host of other problems, and in fact the rise in porn-watching has seen such behaviour fall dramatically - and you have chosen to ignore it all. You have a faith-based belief that porn is bad, and you can't argue with someone who ignores evidence when it contradicts their faith-based belief.
I'll leave you to your certainties. -
laurendorward-990-190608 — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 12:00 PM)
Now I understand. You are totally biased, you are taking little excepts and using them for your own argument yet not looking at the whole article. I hope you can live with yourself and the knowledge you were in relationships with prostitutes.
P.s get tested as stds are rife in pornography
If Stacey Dooley is a moron. what are you?
http://www.covenanteyes.com/2008/10/28/ex-porn-star-tells-the-truth-about-the-porn-industry/ -
Movie_Guy79 — 9 years ago(October 22, 2016 04:58 PM)
What bothered me the most was that some some random "trolls" were the ones meeting out "justice". Thats why we have courts.
As for sympathy, I felt more sympathetic to the guy who played Bron from GOT - all he did was cheat on his spouse. Sure, that isn't an admirable trait but there is a reason that adultery is not punishable by death (at least in Western countries). -
PeterMarkoff — 9 years ago(October 28, 2016 02:19 PM)
i still don't get why he should lose his children because of cheating, yes he will see them less after divorce, but not really losing them or did i miss something why he agreed with this blackmail and rather participated in robbery?
-
xrikou — 9 years ago(October 22, 2016 05:45 PM)
How are you not supposed to feel sorry for the characters? For being so terminally 'judged' by hacker vigilantes? This is what we have laws and courts for. Kenny isn't given a chance to 'fix' his life. He'll be charged with robbery and murder, on top of whatever charges he'll get for watching child porn. He was judged a rotten apple from the hacker/s and just got his life ruined forever.
Perhaps it was the show's intention to make us understand that demonizing anyone and creating in our minds the concept of the two-dimensional evil, sex offender is wrong. I know that the severity of the crime is a red line for a lot of people but this idea is what this episode wants to challenge. Just like the White Bear episode. Is any person worthy of such an intense punishment, one that legal systems today do not give? Did everyone really just sigh in relief at the end saying 'oooooh, thank God, he's just a sick pervert, yeah he got what he deserved'? I don't think so.
And again, just like in 'White Bear' and based on the fact that the hackers targeted the married man for a severely lighter 'transgression' (adultery), I think they're doing it for the sake of trolling. For sick pleasure. Does the viewer really identify with that? -
lone-foxx — 9 years ago(October 22, 2016 11:09 PM)
Those laws and courts are there to service to rich and oppress the poor. How do they serve me? I have many examples, when I was five a man attempted to kill me by suffocation, this was after I saw him kick his pregnant girlfriend down the stairs to kill his unborn child. He tried the same thing with my mother and I got involved, he tried to kill me with a pillow over my facekeep in mind we paid to stay there at this run down old mansion in Santa Barbara. The police refused to do anything, they said, and I quote, "we were just a bunch of junkies". I was five, but I was poor, so thats how much I mattered. Thats how much that baby mattered, thats how much my unborn sister matter, my mother, that poor woman who lost her babyshe was really kind to me, gave me my first action figure. Your laws, your justice, your courts, its all BS.
I saw a person shoot another person twice, so I told my mom and we reported it. The cops refused to look where I said it happened and harassed me (then about seven years old) telling me not to lie to police and make up stories.
Later in Jr High some G13 (Mexican gang) started messing with my friends at school, every week there was a gun or bomb threat. Teachers hid, hell one day our sub spent most of class under a desk hiding from gunshotsso they attacked my friend and I got involved just by pointing out what had happened, a huge ordeal. They tracked me down to my house and set my friend on fire on the bus, I saw him burning alive. Cops didn't give a damn. No-one ever got in any trouble.
That was all in California, where I also had a cop plant drugs on me on the freeway, then take us on a high speed chaseour car was broken down, we'd done nothing wrong. Another time my car was vandalized, I reported it, nothing. I went to fix my car, in the parking lot of Wal-Mart my rear-view mirror fell off in my hand, so I was headed to the bank to get money to go across the street to get a new mirror. A cop car shows up and follows me for a few miles, follows me into the bank parking lot and then turns on the lights. Tells me not to resist and that I need to calm down. Sez my shaking is proof that I am high on drugs, I cannot help shaking I explain, I have a disability caused by spinal meningitis. He sez I am lying and that the baseball bat in my backseat is a weapon and why do I have it? He claims that for these reasons he should arrest me, so I'm lucky he's only giving me a ticket, for my car, that was vandalized.
So I go in to pay the traffic ticket he gave me, I ask the woman at the front desk which courtroom I should go into and she tells me. The bailiff won't let me in, sez I'm late (was right there at the time they specified, I even double checked so as not to be late) and that I'm causing a problem for court proceedings, she sez she will not let me inI'm like, "but I will get into trouble for not showing up", to which she responds, "Thats right, you'll get a bench warrant", at which point I'm like screw it, "Fine, I'm leaving, if I cannot go in whats the point, this is not fair, or legal, and this is why I hate America". I was arrested on the spot. I was taken down to the station, my clothes were stripped, and I was beaten, my money was gone from my wallet when I was finally released. They mocked my last name, its Armenianand my nose (its kind of Eastern-European looking), and the whole time they were beating me they were telling me to respect woman, officers, and the law you love so much. Now apparently the receptionist described me as a tall, dark, and intimidating male who accosted her by saying, "Hey, you bi-atch, where is the motherf-ing judge" or some such nonsense. I have no problem with cursing but I am not stupid, thats not how you talk to anyone, especially not when you need their help.
Quotas, not people; numbers & money.
I was fired from my job when they heard about it, they said my shaking was an obvious sign I was on drugs, just as the cops had saidI was fired for being disabled. I tried to fight it. But I saw America for what it really is; the rich win every time. No lawyer would take my casewhy? I said I was innocent, they said I was guiltyI've always tried to be a good and moral person, sure I don't agree with many of the laws but I respect my fellow humans and animals. It didn't matter, nothing I did mattered, they took everything. I would have done better in life if I had known just how stacked reality is against the small guy. What have these laws done for me? They oppress me, they beat me, they ignore me when I need help, and they exploit everything I have, what little I did have.
At the same time my landlord was being a slumlord, the roof fell in on another friend's head, I pointed this out and nothing was done, this was during Winter. I sat there watching all my money go up into the air; heating the outside world. So I called around to find out my legal options as a tenant, then I sent him a letter he had to sign for stating that I would not pay any further rent unti -
Orlando_Gardner — 9 years ago(October 24, 2016 07:50 AM)
That's the whole point of the build up and reveal. Brooker did the same with "White Bear". It's a commentary on how both the media portray these "monsters" and we, the public perceive them. Here Brooker makes us see a person first,
then
a pedophile second. And it's not to our liking. Actually it's a long running theme from Brooker. Have you seen Brass Eye's "Paedogeddon" episode, which Brooker helped pen?