ANT-MAN DIRECTOR DISAPPOINTED GIANT-MAN MADE DEBUT IN CIVIL WAR
-
CichlidAsh — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 04:07 PM)
I can understand why the Ant-Man director would feel disappointed as it demonstrates one of the other extremes of Ant-Mans powers which I am sure he would have liked to have debuted himself. However just because you are directing the movie featuring a certain character I don't think that means you get to own that character and in a shared universe each character is up for being used for the best effect they can add to each movie. Ant-Man turning into a giant was very effective in Civil War and the airport scene.
Marvel panicked and cost the Ant-Man sequel its 'Giant-Man' premiere.
Panicked by what exactly care to explain a bit on that one?
To make a great film you need three things - the script, the script and the script -Alfred Hitchcock -
wallacesawyer — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 07:12 PM)
Great. Why is that on this board?
Anything that might make Marvel Studios look bad gives the OP a boner.
http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/ -
OdumC — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 03:13 PM)
Not sure what this has to do with Batman V Superman other than to attract the resident trolls.
Looks like he finally bagged one too.Thanks to Batmeh v Supermeh Yawn of Justice, the "S" now stands for Sidekick -
wallacesawyer — 9 years ago(November 02, 2016 07:17 PM)
I think the director has been open about wanting to keep Ant-Man as a more stand alone series, with shared universe references kept to a minimal. Apparently that sort of stuff may have been why Jon Favreau had such a hard time making IRON MAN 2.
I liked seeing Giant-Man in CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR, though. It would've sucked waiting to see that in ANT-MAN AND THE WASP.
http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/