Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. 10,000 GBP

10,000 GBP

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
7 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Crown


    liscarkat-2 — 9 years ago(November 07, 2016 12:42 PM)

    In an early chapter set in 1952, Edward VIII complains about his meager allowance of 10,000 pounds. That's equivalent to 284,000 pounds ($352,000 U.S. dollars) today. Poor old Edward and Wallis were just scraping by.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      randommovies2002 — 9 years ago(November 07, 2016 02:47 PM)

      Plus Edward had other funds as well. In fact, he had bamboozled his brother into agreeing to give him an additional income, claiming he was broke. But then GVI learned from someone in the cabinet that Edward had amassed a fortune of over a million pounds, so GVI halted the funds he'd promised him.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        MrCottonsParrot — 9 years ago(November 08, 2016 03:56 PM)

        One documentary I saw with people interviewed who knew them, said Wallace would wear what appeared to be costume jewellery, but they'd be genuine massive rubies, emaralds and diamonds!
        Imagine how much they'd cost. They'd be not much smaller than the crown jewels themselves. So yeah he must have done ok for himself out of the whole thing, though he claimed poverty.
        "Look at it this way; in a hundred years who's gonna care?"

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          steviepics-1 — 9 years ago(November 08, 2016 04:59 PM)

          His conduct was appalling. He took away a huge sum of money from the Duchy of Lancaster (his as long as he was Prince of Wales, and not thereafter). Greatly underestimated his wealth to his brother and Bertie had to buy him out of Sandringham and Balmoral (the private properties of the family and not the Crown's). Then while Governor of the Bahamas he was conducting illegal currency trades out of which he made huge sums. These were highly illegal in war time. FBI had a big file on him.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            Theshornwonder — 9 years ago(January 31, 2017 07:35 PM)

            Why is making his brother buy homes that belonged to him personally or taking money from a duchy that was his until the very moment he abdicated "appalling"? They were his. Now his brother kicking him out of the country and his sister in law acting like his wife was a monster, those things are "appalling".

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              CheruthCutestoryII — 9 years ago(February 01, 2017 08:07 AM)

              They were not his. That's not how it works. It belonged to the estate.
              And his wife WAS a monster. She was a beep Nazi.
              Most people thought I was a hero for killing Lydia's parrot.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                Theshornwonder — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 09:10 PM)

                Wrong, those properties were personally owned by the monarch, they were not part of the crown estate and upon the death of his father passed directly to him, in his personal capacity. Please provide evidence she was a NAZI.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0

                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Users
                • Groups