Biden promised to nominate a black woman. Last year people were speculating about using this as an opportunity to dump K
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Politics
merry christmas — 4 years ago(January 26, 2022 05:31 PM)
Biden promised to nominate a black woman. Last year people were speculating about using this as an opportunity to dump Kamala but I doubt that will happen.
-
AnthonyRocks — 4 years ago(January 27, 2022 03:59 PM)
Oh, I definitely don't think Joe Biden would nominate Kamala Harris to the Supreme Court and I also definitely think that Biden would not nominate Hillary Clinton to be VP if that job ever did become available.
-
Soul_Venom — 4 years ago(January 26, 2022 08:41 PM)
Appointing Justices is a matter of appointing the very best candidate regardless of who they are.
It is NOT about checking a race/gender box. Now if it does happen to be a black woman then fine. But since skilled, highly educated, black, female candidates are in the minority it is unlikely that one of them will be the best candidate.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
CrystalRaindrops — 4 years ago(January 27, 2022 09:35 AM)
September, 2020:
Trump vows to nominate a woman for US supreme court vacancy within a week
Trump vows to appoint a woman to Supreme Court as vacancy re-energizes his political prospects
Trump moved quickly on Saturday to make the new Supreme Court vacancy a central issue in his campaign, announcing he would name a woman to replace Ginsburg this week. -
merry christmas — 4 years ago(January 27, 2022 06:32 PM)
Appointing Justices is a matter of appointing the very best candidate regardless of who they are.
How do you determine that? Is there an objective measure of what makes a good candidate? Is there any reason to think that beyond some maybe obvious requirements that one candidate becomes more qualified than another? Every idiot in this country thinks they're qualified to second-guess every decision by the court so I figure having a law degree and having served as a federal judge is good enough, just so they are familiar with the technical side of law. -
Soul_Venom — 4 years ago(January 27, 2022 08:31 PM)
having a law degree and having served as a federal judge is good enough,
https://ballotpedia.org/Impeachment_of_federal_judges
Apparently not.
Do I know the criteria? No. But as in any profession there are all stars among the regulars. The supreme court is an all star position.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
WarrenPeace — 4 years ago(January 27, 2022 04:09 PM)
It will be interesting to see what excuses Bitch McConman comes up with this time to stall on letting a Dem POTUS get in his choice.
"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall -
Soul_Venom — 4 years ago(January 31, 2022 12:30 PM)
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/poll-huge-majority-americans-biden-consider-all-nominees-supreme-court-pick
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins!
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 