Many liberals said:
-
Creped_Crusader — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 01:30 PM)
The polls predict popular vote. The polls were right, Hillary got more votes. Presidential forecasts, which use polls to predict the likelihood of a candidate winning are the ones that you could say we're wrong.
-
TaTa_Toothey — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 11:04 AM)
Creep, you said Hillary would win in an ELECTORAL landslide, the biggest since Reagan in 84. It's amazing even though you were 100% wrong for 12 months you are still acting like a pretentious smug know it all douchebag. The polls run by Democratic Party affiliated media outlets aka the mainstream media also claimed Hillary would win in an electoral landslide. This is why you fled the board like a coward after the election and have only slithered out now because you can out and out lie and hope people don't remember all your 12 months of falsehoods and wrong predictions
-
disturbedtool68 — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 01:15 PM)
I don't know anyone who said that. Most people expected a bump upon starting his term
What they are saying is that if he follows through with what he's promised, like trying to renegotiate trade agreements and treaties, and slapping higj taxes on trade with Mexico to pay for his wall, he could start a trade war which could cause the DOW to tumble and negatively effect economies all over the world
But he says a lot of things. Only time will tell if he follows through. One thing for sure, he is finding out that this job that he is unqualified for is a lot harder than he thoughtIgnorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand
-
bbrown2676 — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 01:18 PM)
I don't know anyone who said that. Most people expected a bump upon starting his term
What they are saying is that if he follows through with what he's promised, like trying to renegotiate trade agreements and treaties, and slapping higj taxes on trade with Mexico to pay for his wall, he could start a trade war which could cause the DOW to tumble and negatively effect economies all over the world
Exactly.
Though I find a lot of people on the Right look more for the immediate result and not the long-term. -
moonunit-00839 — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 07:41 AM)
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/cp/opinion/election-night-2016/paul-krugman-the-economic-fallout
By PAUL KRUGMAN
It really does now look like President Donald J. Trump, and markets are plunging. When might we expect them to recover?
Frankly, I find it hard to care much, even though this is my specialty. The disaster for America and the world has so many aspects that the economic ramifications are way down my list of things to fear.
Still, I guess people want an answer: If the question is when markets will recover, a first-pass answer is never.
Libs still trying to rewrite history. -
moonunit-00839 — 9 years ago(February 16, 2017 10:55 AM)
I don't know anyone who said that. Most people expected a bump upon starting his term
What they are saying is that if he follows through with what he's promised, like trying to renegotiate trade agreements and treaties, and slapping higj taxes on trade with Mexico to pay for his wall, he could start a trade war which could cause the DOW to tumble and negatively effect economies all over the worldExactly.
Though I find a lot of people on the Right look more for the immediate result and not the long-term.
Everything you just said was all backwards. -
Pambo_II_The_Wrath_of_Pambo — 9 years ago(February 15, 2017 01:34 PM)
PAMBO WAS RIGHT
:
http://commieblaster.com/obamacrimes/index.html -