Sometimes its difficult to tell from whats in the Bible. Its form is in spirit in which we cannot see, so how does anyon
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Religion, Faith, and Spirituality
The Real Donna — 5 years ago(May 04, 2020 02:12 PM)
Sometimes its difficult to tell from whats in the Bible. Its form is in spirit in which we cannot see, so how does anyone know what God's gender is? What if it were a female? Go is not asexual. God has a sexuality.
-
Vlad. — 5 years ago(May 04, 2020 02:45 PM)
I don’t think a god would be male or female. A god might take on a human form so humans would better relate to it. In the past, decision makers were almost always male hence the God of the abrahamic religions is depicted as a male human. But there’s no reason to think a god would have a sex.
Stop. -
Macuahuitl — 5 years ago(May 04, 2020 02:48 PM)
True. It's less "God is both" and more "both came from God and were made in his image." Then again, only Adam was made in God's image. Eve was just some skank he pulled out of Adam's ass.
But in truth there's no reason for God to have a sex. And let's not kid ourselves: the God of Abraham is
clearly
a man. That guy doesn't **** around. -
Vlad. — 5 years ago(May 04, 2020 02:50 PM)
Why would god have a sex? What the **** is he doing with genitals!? Or, rather, who is he doing? Is he ****ing human women? Human men!!? Angels?!
I don’t think god is of the human form. He can apparently assume the human form but that doesn’t mean it’s his default state. Although the Bible does claim god is a “he” and he created man in “his image.” Maybe we need to ask Miley, she’s an expert.
Stop. -
The Real Donna — 5 years ago(May 04, 2020 02:54 PM)
No..God definitely has a sexuality and a gender. And I think there were at least supreme beings that created the universe we inhabit.
Theres a biblical scripture that implies there being more than one Supreme Being. -
Vlad. — 5 years ago(May 04, 2020 02:55 PM)
It’s a sexist interpretation of humanity’s sexist interpretation of god as a male. It’s blatantly sexist and that’s okay because it’s very true.
My interpretation of god is very much not sexist, however. I don’t think a god would have a gender. No need for sex organs if you don’t reproduce, although that logic is admittedly flawed when you consider the existence of PE and itty, both of whom has penises but don’t use them.
Stop. -
The Real Donna — 5 years ago(May 04, 2020 03:07 PM)
It’s a sexist interpretation of humanity’s sexist interpretation of god as a male. It’s blatantly sexist and that’s okay because it’s very true.
Its not true. I dont feel like searching for bible scriptures right now but refer to The Book of Genesis about the creation of humanity.
My interpretation of god is very much not sexist, however. I don’t think a god would have a gender. No need for sex organs if you don’t reproduce, although that logic is admittedly flawed when you consider the existence of PE and itty, both of whom has penises but don’t use them.
Ive read a few different versions of the holy bible written in english and in every one of them the scripture matches. There is more than one Supreme Being and when i interpret the scripture, it looks as though, both beings made humanity in their image.