CS Lewis on Suffering…
-
filmflaneur — 9 years ago(January 06, 2017 08:09 AM)
In a normal lifespan with normal people, suffering is experienced throughout that life
Is it? I don't know your personal circumstances, obviously, but I doubt I have ever really experienced genuine, ongoing, suffering on my own account. That's not to say I haven't witnessed it, on the news say, but doubt that is what you mean.
Again the goal is to avoid it [suffering], not embrace it or think that's what makes life complete.
While I agree with the sentiment - that it is best to live life for the best, not for the worst it brings, the Bible says otherwise. Which helps explain why the faithful often seem to revel in contemplating the process of their own miseries:
More than that, we rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, and endurance produces character, and character produces hope, and hope does not put us to shame, because God's love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us. [Rom 5:3-5]
I'm well aware that railing does no good
kurt2000 -
pconley22 — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 08:31 AM)
How can you say Buddhism is irrelevant and then turn around and say this:
the goal should be to avoid as much suffering as possible and deal with it when it does happen.
That's pretty much Buddhism in a nutshell.
"
In this scene, you will gargle with mouthwash! Andaction!
" -
smithjgs — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 08:47 AM)
I'm saying it's irrelevant in relation to what Lewis is saying. Suffering is unavoidable. I was under the impression you were saying Buddhism teaches how to avoid suffering.
There is a huge different from avoiding suffering to minimizing it to avoid as much as possible.
If these are one and the same or that is what Buddhism teaches, then there is no contradiction.
My point is that humans need to deal with suffering although it's silly to look forward to it too.
If I were you, I'd wanna be me too. -
pconley22 — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 08:51 AM)
I was under the impression you were saying Buddhism teaches how to avoid suffering.
Overcome is probably a better word than avoid, but, basically, yes; that's what Buddhism teaches.
Lewis' quote seemed resolved to me. Like, he accepted that suffering is part of being human and not suffering somehow affects his humanity. If he had studied Buddhism, he might have realized that suffering is actually a human construct that is a result of attachment more so than some emotion that makes us human.
"
In this scene, you will gargle with mouthwash! Andaction!
" -
smithjgs — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 09:03 AM)
Like, he accepted that suffering is part of being human and not suffering somehow affects his humanity.
My issue with the quote has more to do with the notion that suffering is a good thing and equates to living which is untrue.
Suffering sucks and you don't walk into it. You run away from it like you run out of a rainstorm.
However, it's unavoidable at times and some types of suffering can result in a good thing. The suffering itself, though, sucked.
If I were you, I'd wanna be me too. -
OldSamVimes — 9 years ago(January 18, 2017 04:51 AM)
If he had studied Buddhism, he might have realized that suffering is actually a human construct that is a result of attachment more so than some emotion that makes us human.
I agree.
Suffering is like a mental trap, and in order to escape a trap you examine how the trap is made, that's Buddhism.
Running away from suffering is running away from the opportunity to learn from suffering.
If you've never meditated on the nature of attachment and on things like death and suffering, your suffering will be all the worse when you invariably encounter it. You can't run away from deaths and the fact that everything is temporary. -
smithjgs — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 06:18 PM)
a scintillating examination of the concept of free will in a material universe and why suffering is not only a natural but an essential part of the human experience.
I disagree with this.
If I were you, I'd wanna be me too. -
smithjgs — 9 years ago(January 06, 2017 06:42 AM)
I didn't read the whole thing.
You quoted the part that mattered for what I posted. If that was not the theme of the article than why even have it in the article?
The rest of the article was kind of dry.
What else did you want me to discuss from it?
If I were you, I'd wanna be me too. -
Cademon — 9 years ago(January 04, 2017 10:20 PM)
In conjunction with your first cause thread. What are your thoughts on Lewis' Argument from reason?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_reason -
senseibushido — 9 years ago(January 04, 2017 10:29 PM)
It's always amusing to hear about the limits people have to place on their allegedly omnipotent god in order to make the concept fit with reality.
And every time I hear something to the effect of "suffering is necessary for free will" I have to think that heaven must be a hell of its own. No free will to enjoy eternal paradise, and instead we just become mindless worship batteries? Give me the fire if it means I can actually feel something. -
shaun3701 — 9 years ago(January 04, 2017 11:07 PM)
nope, that isn't what it's like at all. We still have free will in heaven, but we've been purged of sin at that point. You'll have no sinful nature, you'll not have a desire to commit any offense. Pretty much the only desire you'll have is to praise God and enjoy His presence. We won't be the people we are now, we'll be a restored humanity just like Adam and Eve before the fall as they conversed with God in a garden.
And by the way, if you do end up in hell you'll be wishing you couldn't "feel" anything. -
senseibushido — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 12:29 AM)
we've been purged of sin at that point
we'll be a restored humanity just like Adam and Eve before the fall
Uh huh. So tell me, what was "the fall?" I'd like to hear your explanation as to how it
wasn't
sin.
We won't be the people we are now, we'll be a restored humanity just like Adam and Eve before the fall as they conversed with God in a garden.
So what "restored humanity" is this? The blessing of being completely feckless and naive? Explain to me how that's not a revocation of our free will? If we have to give up our humanity, what's the point of being human? And what was the point of having free will in the first place? -
Isapop — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 06:12 AM)
We still have free will in heaven, but we've been purged of sin at that point. You'll have no sinful nature, you'll not have a desire to commit any offense
That does not compute. Isn't it so that Satan originally did not have a sinful nature? And yet he rebelled against God.
(Note: I invite not only
your
response, but also the responses of those who actually
believe
what they are posting.)