CS Lewis on Suffering…
-
smithjgs — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 09:03 AM)
Like, he accepted that suffering is part of being human and not suffering somehow affects his humanity.
My issue with the quote has more to do with the notion that suffering is a good thing and equates to living which is untrue.
Suffering sucks and you don't walk into it. You run away from it like you run out of a rainstorm.
However, it's unavoidable at times and some types of suffering can result in a good thing. The suffering itself, though, sucked.
If I were you, I'd wanna be me too. -
OldSamVimes — 9 years ago(January 18, 2017 04:51 AM)
If he had studied Buddhism, he might have realized that suffering is actually a human construct that is a result of attachment more so than some emotion that makes us human.
I agree.
Suffering is like a mental trap, and in order to escape a trap you examine how the trap is made, that's Buddhism.
Running away from suffering is running away from the opportunity to learn from suffering.
If you've never meditated on the nature of attachment and on things like death and suffering, your suffering will be all the worse when you invariably encounter it. You can't run away from deaths and the fact that everything is temporary. -
smithjgs — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 06:18 PM)
a scintillating examination of the concept of free will in a material universe and why suffering is not only a natural but an essential part of the human experience.
I disagree with this.
If I were you, I'd wanna be me too. -
smithjgs — 9 years ago(January 06, 2017 06:42 AM)
I didn't read the whole thing.
You quoted the part that mattered for what I posted. If that was not the theme of the article than why even have it in the article?
The rest of the article was kind of dry.
What else did you want me to discuss from it?
If I were you, I'd wanna be me too. -
Cademon — 9 years ago(January 04, 2017 10:20 PM)
In conjunction with your first cause thread. What are your thoughts on Lewis' Argument from reason?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_reason -
senseibushido — 9 years ago(January 04, 2017 10:29 PM)
It's always amusing to hear about the limits people have to place on their allegedly omnipotent god in order to make the concept fit with reality.
And every time I hear something to the effect of "suffering is necessary for free will" I have to think that heaven must be a hell of its own. No free will to enjoy eternal paradise, and instead we just become mindless worship batteries? Give me the fire if it means I can actually feel something. -
shaun3701 — 9 years ago(January 04, 2017 11:07 PM)
nope, that isn't what it's like at all. We still have free will in heaven, but we've been purged of sin at that point. You'll have no sinful nature, you'll not have a desire to commit any offense. Pretty much the only desire you'll have is to praise God and enjoy His presence. We won't be the people we are now, we'll be a restored humanity just like Adam and Eve before the fall as they conversed with God in a garden.
And by the way, if you do end up in hell you'll be wishing you couldn't "feel" anything. -
senseibushido — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 12:29 AM)
we've been purged of sin at that point
we'll be a restored humanity just like Adam and Eve before the fall
Uh huh. So tell me, what was "the fall?" I'd like to hear your explanation as to how it
wasn't
sin.
We won't be the people we are now, we'll be a restored humanity just like Adam and Eve before the fall as they conversed with God in a garden.
So what "restored humanity" is this? The blessing of being completely feckless and naive? Explain to me how that's not a revocation of our free will? If we have to give up our humanity, what's the point of being human? And what was the point of having free will in the first place? -
Isapop — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 06:12 AM)
We still have free will in heaven, but we've been purged of sin at that point. You'll have no sinful nature, you'll not have a desire to commit any offense
That does not compute. Isn't it so that Satan originally did not have a sinful nature? And yet he rebelled against God.
(Note: I invite not only
your
response, but also the responses of those who actually
believe
what they are posting.) -
shaun3701 — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 05:17 PM)
Satan is not human, he was an angelic being the highest order among them. He was basically second in command to God. Which is why he got such a big head and thought he could be like God himself.
Original man (Adam) had no knowledge of good and evil, he only knew good because he was created in a perfect world. When the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil was eaten in disobedience, man's eyes were opened and we had the same knowledge the angels have. Unfortunately we're not able to handle the knowledge of good and evil, as evidenced from the past several millennia of war and horror we've inflicted on the world.