http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/07/07/same-sex-kids-raised-gays/
-
CashIsSupreme — 9 years ago(December 19, 2016 02:21 PM)
Sorry Cine, but regardless of the fact that the OP links to Breitbart where a decidedly unscientific spin is to be expected, the study itself comes from a credible source and shows exactly what it is reported to show. Eva brought up one possible factor and another would be the quality of open-access journals. However, that last one would require bringing into question numerous studies on a wide-range of topics.
"An aversion to homosexuality is called heterosexuality." - ErJen
-
Cinemachinery — 9 years ago(December 19, 2016 04:21 PM)
No need to be sorry at all - the reason I'm pointing to Breitbart is the presentation of a study about which the author himself has stated "I agree that its a small sample, and the results should be interpreted with caution." - like ThinkProgress, Mother Jones, etc., it plays up verbiage and uses such studies for click bait instead of reporting.
There's a scarcity of good data on same sex parenting as of yet, one of the reasons being data sets for the results of same sex parenting are still generally taken from 1995 onward, when actually becoming a same sex parents was a battle in and of itself in most areas, there was a higher degree of social hostility, marriage was still denied, etc.
I wasn't even thinking of the open access nature of the journal - more the author's words of caution in both interviews and his own intro, along with Breitbart's added "flair".
"I can use stage combat in a real life fight, right?" - Blade -
YouMightRabbitYouMight — 9 years ago(December 19, 2016 01:03 PM)
It says you assh!les constantly shrieking about how their parents are going to hell or how they should be killed has an effect.
I didn't say it mentioned homosexuality. I said it condemned homosexuality. -
gadreel — 9 years ago(December 20, 2016 05:29 PM)
How do you feel about the studies own admission that the sample size was so small and the unaccounted for factors so prevalent that nothing could be reasonably drawn from the study in terms of actual conclusions?
I am writing this under appreciable mental strain -
Blade_TillTheEnd — 9 years ago(December 26, 2016 01:08 PM)
The gay advocates sure are quiet now. hmm.
I guess they can't claim there's "no difference" between same sex parents and opposite sex parents anymore. The facts say everything.
I have no interest in refraining from my dishonesty and stupidity.
-Cash -
gadreel — 9 years ago(December 26, 2016 01:10 PM)
How do you feel about the studies own admission that the sample size was so small and the unaccounted for factors so prevalent that nothing could be reasonably drawn from the study in terms of actual conclusions?
I am writing this under appreciable mental strain -
-
Eva_Yojimbo — 9 years ago(December 26, 2016 01:18 PM)
Why the hell are you repeating this? The "gay advocates" addressed this study in detail. I even went back and forth with you about it. Meanwhile, gadreel has asked you the same question about half-a-dozen times and you've ignored it.
In the event you have him on Ignore, here's his very pertinent question: "How do you feel about the studies own admission that the sample size was so small and the unaccounted for factors so prevalent that nothing could be reasonably drawn from the study in terms of actual conclusions?"
You seem to leave this highly relevant point out of what "facts" you think the study states. Nevermind conveniently ignoring the dozens of studies that say differently.
warriorspirit
: if the penis is used as a pencil holder we'll incur a cost.