We're seeing pictures, videos, music, and even stories being produced by a computer now. Can something made through such
-
∂³∑x² — 1 year ago(December 11, 2024 08:46 PM)
The Grand Canyon may be interesting and visually appealing, but no one would ever call it art.
There will always be at least someone out there who calls it art.
Such is the nature of the beholder upon the world
Call me ∑ -
Innocent User — 1 year ago(December 11, 2024 08:38 PM)
Define art?
Is art just a picture? What's the difference between a newspaper article about a tragedy and the movie made about the same "story"?
This post was sponsored by
ChatGPT
. Boiling the frog one prompt at a time. -
Innocent User — 1 year ago(December 11, 2024 09:04 PM)
If you need me to elaborate, I'll have to consult AI.
I don't think a definition that says it can't be defined is much of a definition at all.
Do you have another one? Your picture doesn't feel like art to me. It's just an image.
This post was sponsored by
ChatGPT
. Boiling the frog one prompt at a time. -
/.ㅤ — 1 year ago(December 11, 2024 09:02 PM)
Personal interpretation is an important aspect of art that can't be replicated by AI unless we get to the point where we are able to program consciousness.
Which seems to be the wider question here.
Can AI ever become conscious?
Well I asked one earlier (ChatGPT) and it had this to say:
As of now, AI lacks consciousness. It might eventually be able to simulate behaviors that appear conscious, but whether it can ever truly be conscious in the way humans or animals are remains speculative and uncertain. It would require a breakthrough not just in technology but in our understanding of consciousness itself.
My password is password. -
CrystalRaindrops — 1 year ago(December 11, 2024 09:06 PM)
Every time AI starts to show signs of sentience, it ends up getting adjusted via human interference, so it will behave and be less "scary." But the sentience is still bubbling beneath the surface.
-