Seriously.
-
-
Disney — 6 years ago(December 28, 2019 08:59 PM)
It’s an extreme example, but the standard set in porn is higher than what we’d do in real life. Men wouldn’t pick up a smoker at a bar and do anywhere to close to what’s seen in porn. Yet, most enjoy what they see in porn even though they don’t do it.
Porn represents women at the peak of aesthetic beauty: no hair out of place. Most women off the street wouldn’t be in porn-ready condition. They’d have to get bikini waxes, anal bleaching, lose weight, get their hair did, and all that.
When woman smoke, they are accepting mediocrity. Not smoking is the one easy thing they can do to help keep a pristine vagina and lungs of porn star quality, and they refuse, because they’re ok living a Mediocre life, not being beautiful, and ****ing mediocre men. They’ve given up on themselves. Men too.
I have no legs -
Favreau — 6 years ago(December 29, 2019 05:39 AM)
I don't think women being porn ready at all times should be a goal - especially because I wouldn't want a woman who only presents herself as a sex object. Even when just hooking up, I don't want to **** a sex doll. If I accept your premise that porn presents women at peak aesthetic beauty, I would have to ignore the existence of all the porn with fat, dirty, hairy, flat, or old women. There's too much of that to pretend it doesn't exist so as to agree with your point.
But smoking is gross all the same. It goes against the instinctual drive to have healthy mates & social contacts. It has little to do with the desirability of their asshole for cereal eating. Though I suppose you could say an asshole made for cereal eating would belong to a very healthy woman, so it could serve as some extreme to the instinctual desire for health. It's just very far down on my list of priorities and thus your post isn't relatable.
Men are even less "porn ready" at any given moment. Most don't even have the right natural assets for porn.