Why a 7.1?
-
teejaymmk — 13 years ago(March 24, 2013 07:24 PM)
^ what he said.
But then you would here an outcry from people who would say it's nowhere near the same level as X film or Y film that got the same score. Because people on IMDB are dumb and don't realize the top 250 aren't the top 250 films ever made, but the top 250 rated movies on IMDB. If we had a list of top 250 films of all time, 75% of them would be boring "revolutionary forward thinking films" that only a film critic with a PhD in psychology and history would understand. I'm not saying they are bad movies because I really love some of the films that are seen as the "best" or "revolutionary", but others are just beyond the general person.
"I Drink Your Milkshake! I Drink it up!" -
mischimaus — 13 years ago(June 18, 2012 03:23 PM)
7.1. is a decent rating for that kind of movie. 90% of other movies of that style have around 4-5. I enjoy it, I gave it 7 stars too.
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.
-
victoria-a-pk — 12 years ago(November 16, 2013 09:13 PM)
I knooooowww this beep piece of beep site always gives the worst ratings!!! the crapiest of movies have more than 7 and movies that were actually good have a low rating I just sign to vote this movie and complain, I needed to get it out of my chest sorry
-
BHt88 — 9 years ago(April 23, 2016 01:37 AM)
Id say about 6.3 ish
BHT RISES myspace.com/blackheart60 -
dodgyb2001 — 11 years ago(August 17, 2014 05:04 AM)
Given the Dark Knight Rises has an 8.6 this film should be at least that. DKR has huge plot holes, a supposedly genius protagonist who struggles to out -think his opponents and yet somehow prevails whilst this film has a tightly written plot, smart characters being one-upped by smart worms and people who react how l expect l would react. l repeatedly hold it up as the perfect monster movie.
