Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Could Al Turda be a Tara sock?

Could Al Turda be a Tara sock?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
20 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 13, 2025 10:38 PM)

    by /.ㅤ May 14, 2025 12:35 AM
    Member since January 25, 2022
    "I don't use socks."
    Ahem
    "TaraDeS is back, Wu Ming is sleeping."
    Hmm
    Mousy 🐭 on the
    shared account
    /.
    pretends to not know what socks are.
    🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦🧦

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      dbentley666 — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 03:09 AM)

      Paranoid much?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 05:40 AM)

        dbentley666 May 14, 2025 05:09 AM
        Member since June 11, 2018
        Paranoid much?
        Regarding the threads on the TWD board it's more poor Bentley with a mental defect. 🤪

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          dbentley666 — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:00 PM)

          That makes no sense. But then you rarely do.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:26 PM)

            dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:00 PM
            Member since June 11, 2018
            That makes no sense. But then you rarely do.
            The
            wannabe 666
            👿​ always stops understanding English when it's inconvenient for him. ☺
            Btw. good trick that I like to use too.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              dbentley666 — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:27 PM)

              That should be "convenient." Try translating it back into German, and then you might figure it out. Also, it's not a "good trick" for you. Your not understanding English is a way of life, a telos.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:29 PM)

                dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:27 PM
                Member since June 11, 2018
                That should be "convenient." Try translating it back into German, and then you might figure it out.
                Isn't it
                "conveniently"
                in this context?
                lylylylylylylyly. 🤣

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:31 PM)

                  dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:30 PM
                  Member since June 11, 2018
                  No.
                  Adverb –> lylylylyly
                  No? ☺

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    dbentley666 — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:32 PM)

                    No. Not in that sentence.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:34 PM)

                      dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:32 PM
                      Member since June 11, 2018
                      No. Not in that sentence.
                      However, with or without lylylylyly it's understandable. 😜​

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        dbentley666 — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:36 PM)

                        What is?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:40 PM)

                          dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:36 PM
                          Member since June 11, 2018
                          What is?
                          Read again, it's your stupid and wrong call-out thread, little
                          666
                          . 👿​
                          Check your base…lylylylylylylyly. ☺

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            dbentley666 — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:57 PM)

                            TaraDeS said...
                            dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:36 PM
                            Member since June 11, 2018
                            What is?
                            Read again, it's your stupid and wrong call-out thread, little
                            666
                            . 👿​
                            Check your base…lylylylylylylyly. ☺
                            expand
                            So you don't want to reprint your error-ridden sentence? Makes sense.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0

                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Groups