Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Could Al Turda be a Tara sock?

Could Al Turda be a Tara sock?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
20 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    dbentley666 — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:00 PM)

    That makes no sense. But then you rarely do.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:26 PM)

      dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:00 PM
      Member since June 11, 2018
      That makes no sense. But then you rarely do.
      The
      wannabe 666
      👿​ always stops understanding English when it's inconvenient for him. ☺
      Btw. good trick that I like to use too.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        dbentley666 — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:27 PM)

        That should be "convenient." Try translating it back into German, and then you might figure it out. Also, it's not a "good trick" for you. Your not understanding English is a way of life, a telos.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:29 PM)

          dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:27 PM
          Member since June 11, 2018
          That should be "convenient." Try translating it back into German, and then you might figure it out.
          Isn't it
          "conveniently"
          in this context?
          lylylylylylylyly. 🤣

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:31 PM)

            dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:30 PM
            Member since June 11, 2018
            No.
            Adverb –> lylylylyly
            No? ☺

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              dbentley666 — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:32 PM)

              No. Not in that sentence.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:34 PM)

                dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:32 PM
                Member since June 11, 2018
                No. Not in that sentence.
                However, with or without lylylylyly it's understandable. 😜​

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  dbentley666 — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:36 PM)

                  What is?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    TaraDeS — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:40 PM)

                    dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:36 PM
                    Member since June 11, 2018
                    What is?
                    Read again, it's your stupid and wrong call-out thread, little
                    666
                    . 👿​
                    Check your base…lylylylylylylyly. ☺

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      dbentley666 — 10 months ago(May 14, 2025 12:57 PM)

                      TaraDeS said...
                      dbentley666 May 14, 2025 02:36 PM
                      Member since June 11, 2018
                      What is?
                      Read again, it's your stupid and wrong call-out thread, little
                      666
                      . 👿​
                      Check your base…lylylylylylylyly. ☺
                      expand
                      So you don't want to reprint your error-ridden sentence? Makes sense.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups