Pre-emptive pardons?
-
MovieManCin2 β 1 year ago(December 12, 2024 12:26 AM)
It demonstrates the total evil corruption of the DemocRAT Party. They're only interested in POWER, and they will do ANYTHING to obtain or maintain it:
lie, cheat, steal, smear, kill, ANYTHING!
MAGA! FAFO!
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. Dumbocraps: evil people who celebrate murder. 
-
MovieManCin2 β 1 year ago(December 12, 2024 12:42 AM)
The Nixon Pardon was for
one man
. The DemocRATS want to pardon
dozens
if not
hundreds
of people. This demonstrates that they know how much
crime they have committed.
It's also a
gross abuse
of presidential power.
They also think Trump will do to them what they did to him. And he will NOT.
MAGA! FAFO! Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. Dumbocraps: evil people who celebrate murder. -
MovieManCin2 β 1 year ago(December 12, 2024 01:48 AM)
I'm not a constitutional lawyer
(and neither are you)
, so I can't say for sure. At bare minimum it's
a gross misuse
of the pardon power. But then DemocRATS are always
abusing their power.
They only obey laws which they agree with.
MAGA! FAFO! Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. Dumbocraps: evil people who celebrate murder. -
MovieManCin2 β 1 year ago(December 12, 2024 09:00 AM)
No we won't, because those
Soviet Style Political Show Trial
cases will be dismissed, or overturned on appeal.
MAGA! FAFO! Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. Dumbocraps: evil people who celebrate murder. -
Yermom_Is_God β 1 year ago(December 12, 2024 02:52 PM)
Technically you're not a convicted felon until the sentence is issued.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
Yermom_Is_God β 1 year ago(December 12, 2024 03:23 PM)
No, technically not until sentencing. But clearly in this argument for you "winning" is far more important than facts and truth, so continuing further will be nothing but a waste of time. Therefore, you "win." Congrats!
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
Yermom_Is_God β 1 year ago(December 12, 2024 04:02 PM)
/.γ € said...
..unless the treaty specifically equates conviction with a finding of guilt.
Being dishonest as always.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
Yermom_Is_God β 1 year ago(December 12, 2024 04:03 PM)
Yes, your re-writing of the law without any authority is correct. You "win."
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
Pottymouth β 1 year ago(December 12, 2024 04:06 PM)
Yermom_Is_God said...
Yes, your re-writing of the law without any authority is correct. You "win."
Quoting something out of context does not mean you won, even as you misinterpret the law.
Found guilty of a felony and convicted.