Why 'Die Hard 4' sucks.
-
Soodinum — 10 years ago(September 05, 2015 08:58 AM)
Well it's all subjective. Me, I agree with Bruce Willis.
You can watch an interview he did where Kevin Smith asks him a all about the franchise, and Bruce said he really loved 1, but never really got in to 2 and 3. He said at that point (when there was 4) that it felt as if the franchise had two really strong bookends.
He liked everything about it. I agree with him.
BUT it is true that a lot of the deal with movies is subjective - there are clear exceptions: Spears' Crossroads film, anything by Pauly Shore. They are objectively beep But the rest - different strokes.
I just watched all 5 over Fri/Sat and I did realise I like 3 more than 5, but 4 still is one of the best, for me. -
!!!deleted!!! (26676124) — 10 years ago(September 11, 2015 07:56 AM)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkQTub0Ip98&t=0m21s
Dead or alive, you're cuming with me -
Wuchakk — 10 years ago(September 17, 2015 12:41 PM)
DHINO
Why do you keep referring to "Live Free or Die Hard" as "DHINO"? The only other title it's known by is "Die Hard 4.0." I realize DHINO is an acronym, but I'm not getting what it refers to beyond the obvious first two words.
My 150 (or so) favorite movies:
http://www.imdb.com/list/ls070122364/ -
Wuchakk — 10 years ago(September 17, 2015 04:50 PM)
Thanks; that explains it.
My 150 (or so) favorite movies:
http://www.imdb.com/list/ls070122364/ -
Fornicus — 10 years ago(November 25, 2015 03:05 AM)
Just watched it for the first time in years. Good action flick. Ridiculous, sure, but all the Die Hard films are.
Calling it "Die Hard in Name Only" is undoubtedly even more ridiculous, though. Not to mention moronic. Please grow up. -
Drooch — 10 years ago(January 04, 2016 04:29 AM)
You're an apologist for this franchise-raping sht stain of a film. Now read the original post and understand why adjectives like 'ridiculous' and 'moronic' actually describe someone dense enough to put this turd alongside the Die Hard films, such as yourself.