Why 'Die Hard 4' sucks.

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

Soodinum — 10 years ago(September 06, 2015 03:22 AM)

Really? Please grow up.
'Then' and 'than' are different words - stop confusing them.

[fgadmin]

Stef_antique — 10 years ago(November 14, 2015 07:59 PM)

In what way is it better than with a vengeance?
Your statement couldn't be any more ridiculous. With a vengeance is sooo much better than 4.0

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

Soodinum — 10 years ago(September 06, 2015 03:23 AM)

Bruce said the same thing - it felt like the first real sequel to him.
'Then' and 'than' are different words - stop confusing them.

[fgadmin]

!!!deleted!!! (26676124) — 10 years ago(September 11, 2015 07:56 AM)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkQTub0Ip98&t=0m21s
Dead or alive, you're cuming with me

[fgadmin]

Wuchakk — 10 years ago(September 17, 2015 12:41 PM)

DHINO
Why do you keep referring to "Live Free or Die Hard" as "DHINO"? The only other title it's known by is "Die Hard 4.0." I realize DHINO is an acronym, but I'm not getting what it refers to beyond the obvious first two words.
My 150 (or so) favorite movies:
http://www.imdb.com/list/ls070122364/

[fgadmin]

Drooch — 10 years ago(September 17, 2015 04:32 PM)

Die Hard In Name Only.
A Good Day To Die Hard
is referred to as DHINO 2.

[fgadmin]

Wuchakk — 10 years ago(September 17, 2015 04:50 PM)

Thanks; that explains it.
My 150 (or so) favorite movies:
http://www.imdb.com/list/ls070122364/

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

aloep — 10 years ago(October 30, 2015 02:11 PM)

Excellent thread here.
Anyone who thinks this monstrosity is better than Die Hard With a Vengeance deserves to be shot!

[fgadmin]

skinnyg — 10 years ago(November 08, 2015 02:15 PM)

Dhino?

[fgadmin]

Drooch — 2 months ago(January 07, 2026 10:53 PM)

Die Hard In Name Only

[fgadmin]

Fornicus — 10 years ago(November 25, 2015 03:05 AM)

Just watched it for the first time in years. Good action flick. Ridiculous, sure, but all the Die Hard films are.
Calling it "Die Hard in Name Only" is undoubtedly even more ridiculous, though. Not to mention moronic. Please grow up.

[fgadmin]

Drooch — 10 years ago(January 04, 2016 04:29 AM)

You're an apologist for this franchise-raping sht stain of a film. Now read the original post and understand why adjectives like 'ridiculous' and 'moronic' actually describe someone dense enough to put this turd alongside the Die Hard films, such as yourself.

[fgadmin]

LordInsect — 10 years ago(February 22, 2016 02:25 PM)

I dug it.
"Ever danced with the devil in the pale moonlight?"

[fgadmin]

Drooch — 9 years ago(August 19, 2016 11:41 PM)

Cool. Doesn't stop the film from being objectively dogsht for the reasons explained.

[fgadmin]

TheBeardedWonder — 9 years ago(October 19, 2016 04:29 PM)

Haha objective reasons. That word doesn't mean what you think it means

[fgadmin]

Drooch — 9 years ago(January 14, 2017 11:48 PM)

I'm afraid it does, Inigo.

[fgadmin]

SinisterUrge05 — 10 years ago(January 16, 2016 10:45 AM)

Amen Drooch, I completely agree with you. Couldn't have said it better myself. I absolutely hate this movie. It baffles me how people who claim they are fans of the original trilogy (or to the very least the first movie) can praise this piece of sh!t and call it a worthy sequel. When the 5th movie came out, I saw people say how it made them appreciate this one a lot more. I don't get that either. For me, this one and the 5th one made me appreciate 2 and 3 a hell of a lot more then I already did.