…for allegations from 1999 to 2005. Guilty or not, charging someone so long after the fact for this type of crime is r

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Film and Television Discussion

---

Chicxulub — 12 months ago(April 04, 2025 02:41 PM)

…for allegations from 1999 to 2005. Guilty or not, charging someone so long after the fact for this type of crime is ridiculous.
Short of DNA or audio/video evidence, it's just he said, she said. If they had the former, they'd have come forward back then.

[fgadmin]

HollyJollyHanukka — 12 months ago(April 04, 2025 02:44 PM)

Not necessarily.
If you can’t say something nice, say something clever but devastating.

[fgadmin]

bigbadwolf666 — 12 months ago(April 04, 2025 02:46 PM)

They know that,
That’s why their charging him.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

[fgadmin]

Chicxulub — 12 months ago(April 04, 2025 03:02 PM)

I meant to say it shouldn't be legally possible.

[fgadmin]

bigbadwolf666 — 12 months ago(April 04, 2025 04:01 PM)

It should.
Because a Crime is a crime.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

[fgadmin]

Tits Malone, PI — 12 months ago(April 04, 2025 02:46 PM)

It's politically motivated. He's been targeted by the elites.
Donna/LadyGigi Savige needs to sit her ass down!