You know what really grosses me out about women?
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Sex and Dating
Science — 7 years ago(February 13, 2019 05:09 AM)
I'm gagging just thinking about it: when they're so wet that you can hear the sound of the liquid churning during intercourse, and it drips all over themselves, their vag juice all over the outside of the labia, onto their thighs, and all that.
I like wet, but I like it to stay inside of the vagina. I don't like when it gets on their thighs, crack, pelvic bone. And then it gets on the sheets, too. That makes me puke.
I guess the advantage gay people have is (assuming anal isn't in the equation) is you can play with a freshly showered penis and nothing in the bed gets messy (orgasm aside). If you give a guy a hand job, you don't have to worry about secretions or fluids during it. Nothing gets messy; it's just skin. Women can be slops. -
Science — 7 years ago(February 13, 2019 05:28 AM)
No I do.
I just don't like to get my fingers all icky and I don't like wet patches on my comforter. My comforter is too big to fit in the washer, and I don't want to have to bring it to the laundromat every time I had sex with a water dispenser.
It's like how I have to wash my hands after I eat a peanut butter and jelly sammich, because no matter how hard you try, jelly is going to get on your fingers and make them sticky.
Nobody thinks things through. It's no wonder so many have unplanned pregnancies. No one thinks about the aftermath of sex. -
TomcatMurr — 7 years ago(February 13, 2019 05:34 AM)
I'm gagging just thinking about it: when they're so wet that you can hear the sound of the liquid churning during intercourse, and it drips all over themselves, their vag juice all over the outside of the labia, onto their thighs, and all that.
I love that.
I've never understood "straight" guys who are disgusted by vaginas. It would be like a gay guy being all, "penises are alright, as long as they're not too penis-like"… which no gay guy has ever said. -
Science — 7 years ago(February 13, 2019 06:52 AM)
"Vaginas" i.e. procreative genitalia have never been the primary lure for straight male female attraction. It's the boobs, butts, and curves men are enticed by. Not the vagina in and of itself.
Hence why sex in advertising may show women in bikinis to show their shape/curves, but not focus on close-ups of their cameltoe. The vagina alone isn't what attracts men, it's to whom it is attached, - it's only attractive as a sum of its parts.
Generally, when women send nudes, the focus is their butts and boobs in alluring poses, not close-ups of their vaginas.
A picture of a close-up of a vagina isn't naturally a turn on. It'd just look like a pic from a gynecology exam. It need context. The whole body (or some of it, thighs etc.) would have to be showing with it. But a pair of boobs and a butt is very different. -
TomcatMurr — 7 years ago(February 13, 2019 06:59 AM)
Straight men are hardly the only demographic to appreciate butts and boobs. Straight women and gay men seem to appreciate them, too.
And fine, a sterile, clinical image of a pussy may not be too alluring, but the image of an "aroused" (I feel like there's no way to discuss this without sounding clinical or 13 years-old, oddly) swollen vulva/pussy (why not both?) is something of beauty, if perhaps only for the psychosexual association.
Love 'em. Any straight guy who doesn't probably isn't straight (and that's alright!). -
Science — 7 years ago(February 13, 2019 07:19 AM)
Meh, I guess. I guess what a mean by close-up is an image of the canal itself. Usually if the woman's aroused, there's context, without being too specific, fingers, labia, etc. Anuses work similarly. A close-up of an anus obviously isn't a turn on. But if it shows in a picture of a whole ass of a girl bending over, then that's fine. I don't know if gay guys get turned on by anus pictures or not.
