Moose STOMPS on 79-year-old woman taking 🐶 out in yard, Colorado offi-…
-
Platonic_Caveman — 4 years ago(August 19, 2021 07:00 AM)
Most moose don't end up killing people. This one was obviously prone to dangerous behavior. It needed to be put down. Government officials have an obligation to protect the public. This just seems like common sense to me.
I love animals as much as anybody. But I hate weak sentimentality. Do what needs to be done.
Administrator
"filmboards is a bold experiment in free speech and anarchy"
I GameBoy -
Deluded Juice — 4 years ago(August 19, 2021 07:12 AM)
The moose was protecting her kids.
The lady would not have been attacked if the development had not infringed on the turf of the moose.
We as a species hate and are at war with nature and killing animals for no good reason at all is part of it. -
Platonic_Caveman — 4 years ago(August 19, 2021 07:19 AM)
It doesn't matter whatever wrongs were done to the moose. That 79 year old woman was not going to hurt that moose's "kids". Humans need to provide a safe environment for other humans. If that involves killing a moose, then so be it.
Administrator
"filmboards is a bold experiment in free speech and anarchy"
I GameBoy -
Platonic_Caveman — 4 years ago(August 19, 2021 03:06 PM)
The moose is not being punished. It is being eliminated as a menace to society.
No one is making a moral judgment about Bullwinkle's behavior.
Administrator
"filmboards is a bold experiment in free speech and anarchy"
I GameBoy -
Deluded Juice — 4 years ago(August 19, 2021 04:13 PM)
But what if it was just a "one and done" type of thing?
Does that still make it "as a menace to society?"
How does that make it different if a human mother was shooting at an intruder who broke into her house and we think she was doing it to protect her kids?
Would you want her killed?