Aisha = not very attractive.
-
LrdSlvrhnd — 15 years ago(April 27, 2010 08:22 PM)
She was VERY shapely.
Stick's a shape, right?
But yeah, I spent much of the movie wondering just exactly when her legs were gonna snap in half as she was walking. And then wondering what the hell happened to Uhura. My current theory: She either met up with the M-113 salt vampire, or Spock hit pon farr. -
Defenseman13 — 15 years ago(March 09, 2011 06:55 PM)
I've done a lot worse
http://us.imdb.com/board/22339870/ -
igasu — 15 years ago(April 28, 2010 10:59 PM)
Not at all. She has always been skinny and without shape. There is a quote from her in Latina magazine where she says she has no tits or ass. But I will say her legs in this film looked quite well.
http://www.associatedcontent.com/join.html?refer=27142 -
CatelynTullyDidNothingWrong — 15 years ago(April 29, 2010 04:55 AM)
I wasn't aware hourglass figures weren't shapely.
http://www.collider.com/wp-content/image-base/People/Z/Zoe_Saldana/zoe _saldana.jpg
People need to get over their hatred for naturally thin women- or any kind of woman- at some point. Not everyone needs to have huge jugs and/or be 20 pounds overweight thanks to lack of healthy lifestyles. lrn2tolerance
You think you think that you're glowing, but you had been ho-ing, and now you're pregnant. -
Emil308 — 15 years ago(April 29, 2010 10:26 PM)
I wasn't aware some people out there consider sticks to be hourglass figures. lol
Calm down, no one said anything about hating her cause she's a stick. It's called a preference. Not a hatred. Hate is a strong word. The fact is most men prefer a women with more meat on her bones. What are you gonna do? Try to convince men worldwide to change their stance on what they think is a beautiful body(which Zoe's isnt)? Get over it. -
guruboy — 15 years ago(April 29, 2010 11:53 PM)
You obviously have never been to Asia, where the majority of the beauty queens are naturally thin and it is the beauty standard. By my count, they also makeup a very significant portion of the world's population. So your opinion of the "worlds" beauty standard is clearly wrong.
-
Emil308 — 15 years ago(April 30, 2010 08:28 AM)
So my opinion is "clearly wrong" because you say so? Nice one, care to try again? Say what you want, I still believe there's more men in the world that prefer an hour glass figure to a stick figure, and am sure the majority of men would agree with my opinion. Get over it.
-
!!!deleted!!! (4524359) — 15 years ago(May 10, 2010 10:17 AM)
"Maybe, maybe not. But your question still doesn't negate the fact that more men prefer a women with some meat on her bones."
Where do you get these numbers from? There's about 3000000000 men on this planet, how many of them have you asked, and how wide array of cultures were the people you clearly asked about this from?
I personally prefer thin (not skinny) to fat girls which is what people mean when they say women with some meat on her bones. That's not meat on their bones by the way, that's grade A fat. -
naximuz — 14 years ago(December 12, 2011 10:00 PM)
guruboy said:
You obviously have never been to Asia, where the majority of the beauty queens are naturally thin and it is the beauty standard. By my count, they also makeup a very significant portion of the world's population. So your opinion of the "worlds" beauty standard is clearly wrong.
Emil308 said:
So my opinion is "clearly wrong" because you say so? Nice one, care to try again? Say what you want, I still believe there's more men in the world that prefer an hour glass figure to a stick figure, and am sure the majority of men would agree with my opinion. Get over it.
I quit reading this thread soon after that. Why? Because people agree with this Emil guy who says
"So my opinion is "clearly wrong" because you say so?"
to someone else who proves
"in Asia, where the majority of the beauty queens are naturally thin and it is the beauty standard."
. What the beep? The guy didn't drop a personal opinion, he stated a fact. Why do you even TRY to disprove a FACT with some biased personal opinion? Retarded. America do NOT hold the majority of the world population, Asia do. Your opinion is moot, and everyone who agrees with him are hence moot by default. -
Emil308 — 14 years ago(December 13, 2011 08:12 AM)
You quit reading cuz the truth hurts. People agree with this "Emil guy" because he'summmmRIGHT. And he's making sense. So the guy chirps about skinny chicks being the beauty standard in Asia, and you called it a fact. Great. Thanks for pointing out the obvious champ. Although keep in mind Asia does include a handful of Middle Eastern/Arab nations (Jordan, Lebanon,UAE,etc) and they don't like sticks. Trust me i'm Arab, and i've lived in and/or been to many Arab nations in West Asia/Middle East.
Even still, this isn't about the beauty standard in Asia genius, it's about the beauty standard WORLWIDEEEEE. And last I checked, Asia isn't bigger than all the other continents combined smart guy. And all the other continents, North America, South America, Africa, Europe, don't like 11 year old bodies. Do your research.
"American doesn't hold the majority of the world population". Really??! No way! I didn't know that!! Thank you for that oh so obvious statement naximuz, pls hand over your address so I can give you a medal rolls eyes
And newsflash buddy, yes Asia does hold the majority of the world population in ONE CONTINENT. The headcount in Asia doesn't surpass all the other continents combined genius. Furthermore, we are discussing an actress in an AMERICAN movie, aimed at AMERICAN audiences, filmed and shot in world famous curvy-women-loving locales, Miami and Puerto Rico. So we have every right to complain about an actresses body figure which is contrary to the beauty standard of the very target audience the film is aimed at. Therefore YOUR opinion is stupid, moot, dumb, without merit, and everyone who agrees with you are stupid, moot, dumb, and without merit by default.
Are we done troll?