Nolan should be ashamed of himself.
-
-
cremuslohe — 9 years ago(July 23, 2016 05:15 AM)
Remember, though, that DKR had this bizarre Republican/Right-Wing political BJ going on for it, because Nolan specifically chose to use Occupy-types as a villainous entity. It was hugely promoted as "hollywood finally getting it right" by people like Hannity, Limbaugh, etc.
It's not about the movie for a whole crapload of these people. It's about dedicating themselves to everything that panders to their biases as if their way of life was at stake.
Sounds pathetic as all hell, right? That's because it is.
THIS is a very good point! I was thinking this the first time I saw it! -
WallaceHasLanded — 10 years ago(December 02, 2015 03:31 PM)
Tell it to someone who cares
Right. How dare he post a negative opinion about the movie!!
If he was praising and worshipping it like the Hippo-crite, then you would be totally fine with it. Wouldn't have your snide comments to make. -
The_Ultimate_Hippo — 10 years ago(December 02, 2015 04:28 PM)
The OP can dislike the movie all he wants, that's his problem, but to imply that Nolan should be ashamed of making the 60th greatest movie of all time that made over a billion dollars and received universal praise is beyond moronic.
"I really wish Gia and Claire had became Tanner" - Honeybeefine -
WallaceHasLanded — 10 years ago(December 02, 2015 04:28 PM)
It's one mans opinion. Is it really bothering you that much?
It's no more ridiculous than the insanities that Hippo-douche posts. He just has a positive slant for the film, so you don't condescend to him?? -
WallaceHasLanded — 10 years ago(December 02, 2015 05:09 PM)
If that's your opinion, then fire away.
Then use your own idiotic logic to counter argue with yourself.
If Last Crusade was a financial success, and has a good IMDB scorethen it must be great, right? -
WallaceHasLanded — 10 years ago(December 02, 2015 05:19 PM)
It's your logicnot mine. I'm just forcing you to apply it consistently.
Personally, I think it's incredibly stupid. For starters, there's lots of movies that are pretty awful that not only gross insane amounts, but also double, triple, and even quadruple the box office amounts of movies that a majority of people would agree are better films. Being a financial success doesn't determine that a film is somehow superior to any other. By your logic, any film that out grossed TDKR is actually better than TDKR.
As for the IMDB score. Those can be manipulated by rabid obsessive fans who think that the IMDB score of their favorite movie somehow proves that it's one the best movies ever. -
The_Ultimate_Hippo — 10 years ago(December 03, 2015 02:15 PM)
Personally, I think it's incredibly stupid. For starters, there's lots of movies that are pretty awful that not only gross insane amounts, but also double, triple, and even quadruple the box office amounts of movies that a majority of people would agree are better films. Being a financial success doesn't determine that a film is somehow superior to any other.
In that case quit bitching every time I complain about Last Crusade. I mean it's a movie that had great box office numbers that many people seem to think is a good film but in reality it is "pretty awful". I mean afterall "being a financial success doesn't determine that a film is somehow superior to any other". Glad we've set that straight.
"I really wish Gia and Claire had became Tanner" - Honeybeefine