Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. It's not terrible.

It's not terrible.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
2 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Marvel/DC


    TheManInOil — 12 years ago(April 09, 2013 04:08 PM)

    I was expecting much worse. Sure the script wasn't good, the acting was lousy, and the production values were non-existent, but it was fairly true to the comics and the basic story worked.
    I wouldn't say it was any worse than the big-budget version that followed, and it was better than the Rise of the Silver Surfer.
    "I'll book you. I'll book you on something. I'll find something in the book to book you on."

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Cold_In_Space — 12 years ago(April 13, 2013 12:05 AM)

      I agree, slthough I liked the 2005 film more.

      • Gothamite #4
        I've learned that it's OK to be flawed - Winona Ryder
      1 Reply Last reply
      0

      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • Users
      • Groups