and please leave the dumbass comments for another post.
-
pking-2 — 15 years ago(June 21, 2010 10:21 AM)
There's no empirical data to support that claim.
Do you know what empirical data is? It is people who have watched her claiming that they see talent. Which her fans do, just like all fans do.
There's no measurable
objective
data to support anyone's claim to acting talent. Only the empirical data people claiming to they they like what they see. Therefore, she has the same exact empirical data as every other acress ever.
Just, fewer fans and critics claiming to see it
-
clydeerwin — 15 years ago(June 21, 2010 11:06 AM)
I'm a comic book geek who never saw the Transformers movies (never will). Nor have I seen Fox in any other movies. I went into Jonah Hex thinking that Fox would suck based on all the bad press I had heard about her acting. She wasn't bad. I felt that she made an effort and I give her a B for what little they gave her to do. Not great but a little above average. Pretty well summed up by some other posters here, so I just add my vote.
I also agree that Malkovitch was phoning it in.
This movie had tons of nearly inspired moments. Many elements of the film zigzagged from great to awful. The directing and acting at the fore but not alone. One moment its pulling off the techno-primitive/fantasy setting with style and then it will dip briefly into the Wild Wild West level of idiocy. A shame, really. It was close to great but overall is mediocre. -
xerxerxex — 15 years ago(June 21, 2010 11:42 AM)
supafly why click here then? you apparently do not care for Fox so why waste your time? My opinion eventhough you didn't ask fir it is, you have nothing better to do you spew your useless comment on a board that holds no interest to youkinda sad.
"Whoo! Whoo! Hey, Parny. I'm going to Chicago, baby! I'm driving a stick!" -
NeedysBoy — 15 years ago(June 22, 2010 07:44 AM)
clydeerwin sums up Megan's performance quite well.
It wasn't great, it wasn't bad. It was
good
.
She's been good in everything that I've seen her in. (That Olsen twins' project,
Transformers
,
Jennifer's Body
, and a few small TV roles.)
Yeah, there is no way she is a realistic old west whore. She looks like an angel in this. A beautiful, sweaty angel. But everyone needs to remember on this point and other plot elements: this is a movie. It is inherently a
fantasy
! And Megan Fox is great at playing a fantasy.
P. A. T. (Needy's Boy) -
skoobaba — 15 years ago(October 04, 2010 08:45 AM)
Fox did ok. She did the best she could, with what she had to work with. She wasn`t the worst actor in this movie, nor the best. Allthough I am hard pressed to pick one, on both account. The scrips was what ruined this movie.
-
jimanchower — 15 years ago(November 29, 2010 12:06 PM)
Fox was a total non factor. Her part was small and could have been played by a million other actresses.
She can't act, and I didn't buy her for one second as either a world wise prostitute or as a badass at the end, but in her defense she looked good.
