and please leave the dumbass comments for another post.
-
xerxerxex — 15 years ago(June 21, 2010 11:42 AM)
supafly why click here then? you apparently do not care for Fox so why waste your time? My opinion eventhough you didn't ask fir it is, you have nothing better to do you spew your useless comment on a board that holds no interest to youkinda sad.
"Whoo! Whoo! Hey, Parny. I'm going to Chicago, baby! I'm driving a stick!" -
NeedysBoy — 15 years ago(June 22, 2010 07:44 AM)
clydeerwin sums up Megan's performance quite well.
It wasn't great, it wasn't bad. It was
good
.
She's been good in everything that I've seen her in. (That Olsen twins' project,
Transformers
,
Jennifer's Body
, and a few small TV roles.)
Yeah, there is no way she is a realistic old west whore. She looks like an angel in this. A beautiful, sweaty angel. But everyone needs to remember on this point and other plot elements: this is a movie. It is inherently a
fantasy
! And Megan Fox is great at playing a fantasy.
P. A. T. (Needy's Boy) -
skoobaba — 15 years ago(October 04, 2010 08:45 AM)
Fox did ok. She did the best she could, with what she had to work with. She wasn`t the worst actor in this movie, nor the best. Allthough I am hard pressed to pick one, on both account. The scrips was what ruined this movie.
-
jimanchower — 15 years ago(November 29, 2010 12:06 PM)
Fox was a total non factor. Her part was small and could have been played by a million other actresses.
She can't act, and I didn't buy her for one second as either a world wise prostitute or as a badass at the end, but in her defense she looked good.
