PR NETWORK INTEL OPERATIVES CONTROL GEORGE CLOONEY'S SOCIAL MEDIA SITES
-
pauldouglas-41263 — 10 years ago(September 18, 2015 03:27 PM)
About that so called "good bye award" that George Clooney received
By my count in the 62 years that the award has been given out only 11 people were over the age of 70, hardly the majority that you claim. Clooney is actually one of the younger recipients as there have only been 8 people younger than George Clooney when they received the Cecil B DeMille Award.
Hardly the "going away award" that you claim.
Do you ever look up the facts before you post?
Year Honoree Age
1952 Cecil B. DeMille 71
1953 Walt Disney 51
1954 Darryl F. Zanuck 51
1955 Jean Hersholt 68
1956 Jack L. Warner 63
1957 Mervyn LeRoy 56
1958 Buddy Adler 48
1959 Maurice Chevalier 70
1960 Bing Crosby 56
1961 Fred Astaire 60
1962 Judy Garland 39
1963 Bob Hope 59
1964 Joseph E. Levine 58
1965 James Stewart 56
1966 John Wayne 58
1967 Charlton Heston 43
1968 Kirk Douglas 51
1969 Gregory Peck 52
1970 Joan Crawford 65
1971 Frank Sinatra 55
1972 Alfred Hitchcock 72
1973 Samuel Goldwyn 90
1974 Bette Davis 65
1975 Hal B. Wallis 76
1976 Not awarded None
1977 Walter Mirisch 55
1978 Red Skelton 64
1979 Lucille Ball 67
1980 Henry Fonda 74
1981 Gene Kelly 68
1982 Sidney Poitier 54
1983 Laurence Olivier 75
1984 Paul Newman 59
1985 Elizabeth Taylor 52
1986 Barbara Stanwyck 78
1987 Anthony Quinn 71
1988 Clint Eastwood 57
1989 Doris Day 64
1990 Audrey Hepburn 60
1991 Jack Lemmon 65
1992 Robert Mitchum 74
1993 Lauren Bacall 68
1994 Robert Redford 57
1995 Sophia Loren 60
1996 Sean Connery 65
1997 Dustin Hoffman 59
1998 Shirley MacLaine 63
1999 Jack Nicholson 61
2000 Barbra Streisand 57
2001 Al Pacino 60
2002 Harrison Ford 59
2003 Gene Hackman 72
2004 Michael Douglas 59
2005 Robin Williams 53
2006 Anthony Hopkins 68
2007 Warren Beatty 69
2008 Not awarded None
2009 Steven Spielberg 62 *
2010 Martin Scorsese 67
2011 Robert De Niro 67
2012 Morgan Freeman 74
2013 Jodie Foster 50
2014 Woody Allen 78**
2015 George Clooney 53 -
pauldouglas-41263 — 10 years ago(September 18, 2015 04:30 PM)
Davida what's this Wayne's TV show? No listing on IMDb or anywhere else about this show you supposedly were on.
http://www.bing.com/search?q=wayne's+tv+show&go=Submit&qs=n&form=QBLH&pq=wayne's+tv+show&sc=6-15&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=8b2349a7c1964c5196ddf939eb22a1e3 -
upsey-69152 — 10 years ago(October 27, 2015 10:09 PM)
Yet another thread Davida stirred the beep and abandoned. She's got a lot to answer for if she ever dares to show her face again around here, though I somehow doubt that even she is dumb enough to come back her under her own name.
-
EJverh — 10 years ago(September 03, 2015 03:21 AM)
Personally, I wouldn't be placing Clooney on the 'watch list' because of his wife (though it certainly warrants it) but because of Clooney himself. He is one of those super ultra liberal movie stars (like Affleck) that are the real threat to our safety in today's world. These bleeding hearts don't even know what they believe or stand for anymore and in the end it's a bit unnerving and worry some the way they place themselves in the pickle. Their (usually) noble, well intentional fight for liberty and equality for example same sex marriages, women's rights and freedom of speech and religion are good arguments worth fighting for. But then they get involved in the middle East and they end up on the side of the terrorists or terrorists in training, like the Syrian rebels for example or the Palestinians and their 'rights' or lack of. In this process though they end up supporting the very people who stand against everything they so ardently fight for. Therefore they place themselves in a weird almost laughable situation of contradiction as they support the people who hang homosexuals in the public square, kill women for educating themselves, massacre the unbelievers and Westerners, even their own Muslims who belong in the different following of Islam and have zero freedom of speech for those are murdered too. So, in the end, what/who do they think they are supporting, or do they take time to think at all? Being a liberal nowadays (or fanatic liberals bred largely in the brainless, clueless, luxury of Hollywood) seem to consist of being a spokespersons for a cause, any cause, for the sake of having a cause and creating more chaos and complains about all that is 'wrong' with our country that they seem not to love, care for or respect. It is enough to make one switch parties, honestly.
-
pauldouglas-41263 — 10 years ago(February 05, 2016 03:23 PM)
Don't you get tired of copying and pasting the same foolish things onto so many threads here? Are you incable of writting down your own thoughts? Then again, you're beyong stupid so I'd have very little interest in reading anything you have to say on your own as it would only be a reflection of your stupidity and insanity. So go on, continue passing off others words as your own, it couldn't be worse than whatever words you'd manage to stumble to string together,