Lost her virginity at 22? What!!!!!?????
-
HotRod_SC — 14 years ago(June 12, 2011 11:03 PM)
43, now that's shocking. I see no big deal in young twenty-somethings waiting and all, but if you haven't done it by 43 either you can't or you won't, but good moral values seem a weak excuse by then, since in a couple of years you won't be able to have kids and stuff, it just keeps getting harder when time passes by. Are you sure you don't have other motives for remaining a virgin, like being gay, or being asexual, or hating men, or just can't find any guy at all?
I think it's unfair to put more pressure on you, but reevaluate your true feelings about it, just a sane advice from a guy that means no harm at all.
now this is acting: http://www.imdb.com/media/rm2458172160/tt1528718 -
drxcreatures — 12 years ago(February 01, 2014 10:11 PM)
LOL jib, you think all relationships (dating-wise) consist of sex?
http://www.cgonzales.net
&
http://www.drxcreatures.com -
-
Sylphadora — 16 years ago(May 31, 2009 09:18 AM)
So what?? Is there a rule that says that you have to lose your virginity before 20?? I'm 23 and I'm still a virgin. I don't know why some people are so shocked about other people being virgin at 20.
Jmpeee
, don't think that all the people who are virgin at 20+ are die-hard believers. For example, I do not believe in God, so religion is not the reason why I'm a virgin. And I'm not a prude, either. I am perfectly fine with people having sex just for kicks. I wouldn't do it because I am too much of a romantic to do that, but I do not have a problem with other people doing it. I'm still a virgin just because I've never had a boyfriend, and I wouldn't like my first time to be a fling, a one-time thing with a person I've just met at some randon club. I would like it to be with someone I'm in love with, and not just for the pure physical pleasure, I would like feelings to be attached to it. -
Jane_Claire — 16 years ago(February 13, 2010 06:20 AM)
"Because all serious actors are SL*TS!
Come on!
Shes a normal person as well.
There is a line between her fame life and her private life."
Yeah, no kidding!
. I think it's cool she held out for a while even though she regrets it (I think
that's
stupid). -
blondeprincess — 15 years ago(May 07, 2010 10:55 AM)
taylor.
thank u for ur point..
i really wasnt implying or saying that she wud be a tramp cuz she played a child prostitute. if u read what i said.. i said becuz she was in the limelight and compounded by hollywood lifestyle.. so many young ones turn out to be promiscuos i mean look. even if they marry.. it isnt long before it is annulled or they get a divorce.. or cheat etc..
i was surprized.. as many others were .. that she kept her virginity for that long..
to say there is tasteful nudity is like saying there is tasteful moonshine.. thats a load of foolishness. u think the perves aint looking at her in a bad and nasty way?!??!?!?!?!!?? c'mon!
)
..) .*)
(. (.Princess -
blondeprincess — 15 years ago(May 07, 2010 03:04 PM)
taylor
i dont mean to be nasty .. if thats how u took it.
its becuz i thought brooke being 12 yrs old and nude .. in any form.. in the film .. was something a perve wud probly wana get off on.. i am happy there are others who do not have this perspective. like urself.. thinking it was tasteful.. i have no prob with ur opinion.. i just think if a perv thinks or hears theres guna be a underage girl in a film nude! - he will watch it.. which shows that Brookes mom letting her do this.. would have opened the doors to some real perv's watching or being obsessed with her.. we have never heard anything bad that has happened to it becuz of it.. which is good.. but hey what about those pageant lil girls with makeup that so many ppl r upset about.. those lil girls arent nude.. and yet ppl r worried bout those lil ones being victims of perv's.
i really am surprized i have to keep explaining myself and that u think anyone elses opinions are so "shocking"
)
..) .*)
(. (.Princess -
HotRod_SC — 14 years ago(June 12, 2011 11:49 PM)
I don't see nothing wrong with her nude scenes in that flick if they serve the story properly, after all it's a story that need to be told the right way, not with 1 year olds pretending to be 11 or stuff. But I gotta say her nude photos taken when she was 8 could definitely be considered child porn, i'm actually surprised they were ruled as not child porn by a judge: the intention in that work was definitely to sexualize her image, so that can count as child porn, wether their parents agreed or not has nothin to do with it. Some guy said porn always involves sexual relations, that's not true, otherwise there wouldn't be the definition of "soft porn".
now this is acting: http://www.imdb.com/media/rm2458172160/tt1528718 -
lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(January 03, 2017 06:47 AM)
wait how are those pics automatically child porn? what so you can't take a nude picture of a child model ever? and I really dont' understand why brooke had to go to legal lengths to prove that some of her character's nudity scenes or sex scenes were not her in the blue lagoon because she was underage? I mean she was nude in pretty baby and as long as her parent gave her permission to do those nudity and sex scenes then why was it a problem?
-
qvtkc — 15 years ago(May 07, 2010 02:05 PM)
to say there is tasteful nudity is like saying there is tasteful moonshine.. thats a load of foolishness. u think the perves aint looking at her in a bad and nasty way?!??!?!?!?!!?? c'mon!
What do you mean?? It can be tasteful If it's done right. Properly distilled and filtered, some flavor added, and moonshine is practically impossible to tell apart from some generic liquor.
And pervs can look at anything in a nasty way. It's how normal people see it that matters. If the story supports it It's ok.
This sig has been deleted by an administrator -
blondeprincess — 15 years ago(May 07, 2010 03:17 PM)
qvtkc
im glad u know so much bout ur moonshine.. have u made it urself?
ya maybe it "tasteful" im just sayin sum pervy ppl wud look at her and be turned on. and thats so gross. why wud a parent put their kid in any type of a roll or light that wud even have a remote possibility of making a perv get off. thats so sick. i just think it was bad judgement.. sure it helped her carreer.. but if she had been victimized - do u think she wudda been pleased her mom let her be in such a role? doubt it. parents r supposed to parent.. not look at making money off their kids. kids shud be kids not worker bees.. altho i have enjoyed many young kids movies .. that did not include nudity.
just my point of view.. u have ur own.. i have mine.. we dont need to 100% agree.
)
..) .*)
(. (.Princess