Uh oh
-
Lilith — 9 months ago(July 03, 2025 12:48 AM)
I'm not sure. I do think that Diddy was not the top fish in this food chain, however.
The jury really did not look at how coercive this guy is with manipulating women and sexually abusing them. There was so much evidence. The jury's sticking to how these women always had "free will" have no idea how trauma bonds work or when someone is involved in a domestic violence relationship.
He got away with it.
And his supporters were standing outside of the courtroom pouring baby oil over themselves? Unbelievable.
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." – Warren Smith -
MiniMasterpieceTheater — 9 months ago(July 03, 2025 02:41 AM)
Seems like it's more an example of over zealous prosecution…at least by the juries conclusiond. Sometimes you don't have the case you wish you had…and it shows
Cold comfort for change? Did you exchange
A walk-on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? -
Lilith — 9 months ago(July 03, 2025 03:53 PM)
I see this as a complicit prosecutor and hardly one who is overzealous. This was a show trial. They couldn't fulfill the RICO charges because that would risk exposing the recipients of the sex and drug trafficking. This way, all of the famous people remain safe from prosecution and continue to be unnamed.
No doubt, the FOs will continue with a new person orchestrating everything.
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." – Warren Smith
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 