how 'fat' was she
-
makm76 — 13 years ago(March 28, 2013 12:46 AM)
I know this is several years old and you'll probably never read it, but you aren't necessarily correct.
I had a friend in high school who was 5'6" and weighed about 145-150 pounds. We had a program at the local hospital (job shadowing and such), and at one point they measured how much body fat we all had. Hers was about 15%, despite the fact that her BMI was at the high end of normal (155 is overweight for that height). That's about as low as a woman's body fat can be and still be considered healthy. And she wasn't an athlete, either. She just had a more muscular build than average.
I'm aware that the machines they use to measure body fat aren't perfect, but since anything under 25% is considered fit (32% is obese), it's highly unlikely that hospital-quality measurements would be far enough off to put her outside that 5b4range.
So I know for a fact that it's possible for a girl that height and a little over ten pounds lighter to have a low body fat percentage. I would not be at all surprised if it was possible for someone to be 5'6", 162 pounds, and have say 20% body fat (in fact, if my friend were to gain weightpure fatto be 162 pounds, her body fat percentage would be between 21 and 24%, depending on her precise weight before). And for women, 14-20% body fat is considered "athletic" and 21-24% is considered "fit," according to the American Council on Exercise. -
threadman80 — 12 years ago(June 15, 2013 09:00 AM)
Well I guess none of it matters after this:
http://www.google.com/imgres?q=danielle+fishel&sa=X&biw=1435&bih=709&tbm=isch&tbnid=4HiukBSdUsIJtM:&imgrefurl=http://perezhilton.com/2013-03-08-danielle-fishel-covers-maxim-april-2013-topanga-bra-lingerie-hot&docid=JoTohmhDCFyvHM&imgurl=http://i.perezhilton.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/danielle-fishel-topanga-covers-maxim-april-2013-1__oPt.jpg&w=450&h=634&ei=bI-8UZODLo-49gSFzIDQDw&zoom=1 -
funkykat — 18 years ago(December 22, 2007 07:30 PM)
BMI isn't a good indication but she was fat. She was carrying a lot of adipose tissue.
http://www.dimensionsmagazine.com/images/future_plumpers/Danielle_Fishel/Danielle_Fishel/PeopleMag-e.jpg -
josephcurdy — 18 years ago(December 23, 2007 09:14 AM)
LOLthis is some of the worst photo-shopping I've ever seen done to enhance someone's corpulence. She's a lil' chunky, but come ontrying to photoshop her to look as rotund as DeVito or an Oompa loompa is reaching
Nice try, but your Photoshop Fu is a failure -
Shattered_Wake — 18 years ago(January 23, 2008 11:36 AM)
5'1", 130 lbs, can be considered fat depending on the build.
If she says she fat, she might be built like that. . . more fat than muscle which gives the appearance of being fat.
-AP3-
George A. Romero's '
Diary of the Dead
'
Shoot the Dead - 02.15.08 -
unguarded_heart — 17 years ago(November 23, 2008 10:11 PM)
Alright, heres my two cents: Danielle Fishel did put on some weight back in the day (I heard she had some sort of drug problem but I don't know) but not enough to be called fat. Since you're saying 5'1" and 130 is PERFECT then would I be too thin at just under 5'1" and only 105 pounds? I think she carries herself very well and I like her as an actress
"I am the WAY the TRUTH and the LIFE, no man comes to the Father but through me"Jesus Christ -
-
Tplj1919 — 18 years ago(January 10, 2008 07:06 AM)
actually BMI is a good indication for her. She is one of the biggest people I have seen on television. We know she can't be a body builder ether! That means she should be at a BMI of say 20.
Actually did anyone know her frame? Small, medium, or large? I think I remember she was medium frame. Medium would mean if you take bmi into consideration she should be a bmi of 20-21. -
-
Samuraibro — 17 years ago(June 26, 2008 12:57 PM)
I know! She has a great body. I'm about 5,5-ish
and weight 5.4kilos, (about 119 lbs.)
and I'm not overweight. My build is a lot different
than some people think. It doesn't distrubute very evenly.
I wish I had her figure, and I'm probably skinnier than her!
