Horrible Horrible Horrible , beyond Horrible actor
-
lazy_guitar_remix — 16 years ago(October 19, 2009 06:51 PM)
Sadly, Thomas Jane's last few films were mediocre. But he really can be a good actor. I've seen it. Maybe he's in a slump. Who knows. But he was excellent in 61*, Thursday, and other earlier films. maybe he's just not challenging himself lately.
-
kevdor — 16 years ago(November 09, 2009 03:51 PM)
It's one thing to have an opinion, but calling this actor "horrible", partly becauese you don't think he's good looking shows you are either very stupid and/or simply know nothing about acting, or again you probablty just saw him in ONE role you didnt like and you flame him for that either way you are obviously confusing things and your motives are meaningless. He's not the best, but he carries out his roles brilliantly, and he has a presence on screen, therefore he deserves the fame and should be put in more productions.
I wouldnt be surprised if you were one of those little 12 year old Ray Stevenson fanboy in hiding who actually liked the excuse for a movie called Punisher War Zone?
I see dumb people everywhere, and sometimes, they don't even know they're dumb! -
sloanrules — 16 years ago(November 21, 2009 03:26 PM)
i will try to, i think when i started this message page i was in a bad mood or smeothing, im not mornally that miserable its just i saw thos 2 movies in a week and was disappointed everyone deserves a 2nd chancethanks for understanding my opinion and giving a very nice opinion yourself
-
dissident187 — 16 years ago(December 20, 2009 08:02 AM)
He was absolutely atrocious in the Mist and wooden in The Punisher. I thought he had no scope at all in Hollywood. But then I saw Stander, and man, was that a mesmerizing performance. Dark Country was pretty good as well.
"If I were a dog and you were a flower, I'd lift up my leg and give you a shower" -
tixepower — 16 years ago(December 26, 2009 03:36 AM)
I think his acting was fine in the mist although maybe not SUPER. I would rather see him than paris hilton or other bitch that usually get big roles. THis guy can do the average acting and it's fine with me, I only hate below average acting.
-
Ryokochan64 — 16 years ago(January 01, 2010 07:06 AM)
It may be hyperbole to say horrible horrible beyond horrible actor, i've only seen him in the mist and hung, and to be honest, he wasn't very memorable at all. I remember liking the story, and liking the ending, but not one of those actors stood out to me except for maybe that crazy evangelical chick. I think he does a fair job in hung, sometimes he feels inauthentic, but i really only feel that way in some of his VOs and scenes w. the kids, and you know, i think that can be attributed to the writing, which, to me, seems to really showcase the women's talent. I'd say 75% of the time, he hits the nail on the head. plus he's paired with other strong actors and actresses as well, so i really only see his craft improving. There are definitely far worse actors out there, eg, aside from 300, i feel like gerard butler is incrementally wasting precious minutes of my life with his "craft."
-
sloanrules — 16 years ago(January 01, 2010 10:14 AM)
well thanks for replying and not being nasty, like i said i think i was in a bad mood the day i made this post , ididnt expect so many replies. u can check my other posts, i am NOT a troll at all.Happy Holidays
-
kenneth1983 — 16 years ago(January 20, 2010 06:23 PM)
His performance in "The Mist" was cringingly painful to watch. He was just so unbelievable in his portrayal of the character. The emotions and body language didn't feel genuine nor convincing at all. I was taking myself out of the story and zooming in on his sub par acting. The movie had alot of potential and could have been much better.
-
Ariadnes_Web — 16 years ago(March 06, 2010 05:21 PM)
I'm not sure about him being "horrible", but I don't find him the best. Sometimes I wonder how he even got parts in some of the movies he's been in. The first time I saw him was in crappy "The Sweetes111ct Thing", I didn't care for his acting, then again the movie was pretty lame. But, one thing I have noticed about him, which bugs me, is that he doesn't have very good facial expressions. When he is supposed to be surprised or come to an epiphany, it just looks like bad acting. I'm not sure if anyone knows what I'm talking about, but that's what bugs me about him. And I do have to agree that, for the most part, he tries to look sexy/manly instead of worrying about acting. There have been some movies that he acted very well in, though. This is just MY opinion!!! Sorry if I made anyone upset.
-
RobertHolik — 16 years ago(March 20, 2010 03:38 PM)
@ sloanrules. Ok first of all, I don't take anyone's comments seriously if they write "cuz" instead of "because".
Second, have you seen him in "The Mist"? He moves every inch of his face through out the whole movie, he's a rare actor who has so much intensity and expressions in his face.
My thoughts on movies, and then some: www.robertholik.blogspot.com