This message has been deleted.
-
Trapstar6 — 19 years ago(July 05, 2006 07:07 AM)
Ahy, Some of these lil chicks be presistant. R.Kelly is in a position where he is in the public eye, he got all this fame and Money. When you add the fact that he just another dude from the "Hood" that made it to the equasion, that equals in his mind he is untouchable. See Im not saying what he did was right but, I understand. See the average person would say with his status he can get damn near any chick he wants (Of age). But what do lil 14 year old girls want? What? a pair of shoes?, a new outfit?, If he was hitting a chick lets say 21 she would want a new house, car, ect. If you seen the tape he took that money back. It was probably no more than $200. And to R. Kelly whats $200? I think they should sentence him to a Money saving tactics Siminar. He had the right intentions to save money he was just sloopy with his plan. The Chick probably never come forth until her Of age aunt wanted $. Which would buy the new Car, House ect.
Free Larry Hoover -
CholeAngelEyedHunE — 19 years ago(August 03, 2006 05:14 PM)
"I'd have sex with girls that age if I could (they'd be white, though), but I can't. Why do different laws apply to R. Kelly?"
You're disgusting. So the fact that he has sex with underage girls is fine with you; you're just upset that he got away with it and if you pulled something like that, you woudln't. Whether or not you or R. Kelly could get away with it, it's still sick and wrong.
good friends bail you out of jail; best friends sit next to you in jail saying "boy that was fun!" -
miss_brightside77 — 19 years ago(August 29, 2006 10:25 PM)
You're disgusting. So the fact that he has sex with underage girls is fine with you; you're just upset that he got away with it and if you pulled something like that, you woudln't. Whether or not you or R. Kelly could get away with it, it's still sick and wrong.
Exactly.
He's scum.
Long live the rose that rose from concrete -
lildeeroxx — 19 years ago(November 25, 2006 10:08 AM)
yeah, i can't even believe some people think that it's okay.. i mean it doesn't matter if the girl consented or not, HE is the adult. HE should of known better, and HE was the one who was supposed to realize that she is a child.. and since he didn't care about it that just means he's beyond disgusting and needs to be behind bars where he could be some fat man's bitchh.
-
B3B — 19 years ago(December 10, 2006 07:58 PM)
i dont mean to go all religious on yall but the bible says that as harsh as we judge somebody that is how harsh he is going to judge us on judgement day. we should think twice about judging somebody we dont know personally. yes what he did was wrong but whos to say that he cant change? watch one day we will all give an account of our lives and we are going to see the real us.
-
furious_georgina — 19 years ago(March 01, 2007 05:58 AM)
Dispositioner, the difference between a 14 year old man having sex with a 14 year old girl and a 30 year old man having sex with a 14 year old is vast. 14 Year old boys are walking hormone time bombs and given the chance they'd sleep with any 14 year old girl that lets them, they are both equals in the fact that they are the same age. A 30 year old man however should know better, he is an adult and should not be soliciting young girls half his age for sex, at 30 years old a man should be able to handle a real woman over the age of consent.
I'm in my tree talking to the Dixie Chicks and they're making me feel better
but just bc i like alot of his music and i give him credit for being a good song writer doesnt mean i support what he did.