Horrible Horrible Horrible , beyond Horrible actor
-
sloanrules — 16 years ago(January 01, 2010 10:14 AM)
well thanks for replying and not being nasty, like i said i think i was in a bad mood the day i made this post , ididnt expect so many replies. u can check my other posts, i am NOT a troll at all.Happy Holidays
-
kenneth1983 — 16 years ago(January 20, 2010 06:23 PM)
His performance in "The Mist" was cringingly painful to watch. He was just so unbelievable in his portrayal of the character. The emotions and body language didn't feel genuine nor convincing at all. I was taking myself out of the story and zooming in on his sub par acting. The movie had alot of potential and could have been much better.
-
Ariadnes_Web — 16 years ago(March 06, 2010 05:21 PM)
I'm not sure about him being "horrible", but I don't find him the best. Sometimes I wonder how he even got parts in some of the movies he's been in. The first time I saw him was in crappy "The Sweetes111ct Thing", I didn't care for his acting, then again the movie was pretty lame. But, one thing I have noticed about him, which bugs me, is that he doesn't have very good facial expressions. When he is supposed to be surprised or come to an epiphany, it just looks like bad acting. I'm not sure if anyone knows what I'm talking about, but that's what bugs me about him. And I do have to agree that, for the most part, he tries to look sexy/manly instead of worrying about acting. There have been some movies that he acted very well in, though. This is just MY opinion!!! Sorry if I made anyone upset.
-
RobertHolik — 16 years ago(March 20, 2010 03:38 PM)
@ sloanrules. Ok first of all, I don't take anyone's comments seriously if they write "cuz" instead of "because".
Second, have you seen him in "The Mist"? He moves every inch of his face through out the whole movie, he's a rare actor who has so much intensity and expressions in his face.
My thoughts on movies, and then some: www.robertholik.blogspot.com -
-
jjcuse11 — 16 years ago(March 21, 2010 06:44 PM)
I think basically the roles he has chosen maybe were not the best fit for him. I do like him as an actor but i will def. agree he was terrible in the mist and dreamcatcher, but those movies were horrible as well. He has done well in smaller roles such as Boogie nights and face off. He did an excellent job in 61 as Mickey Mantle. Hung was the perfect role for him, deservedly so he was recognized for it.
-
sloanrules — 16 years ago(March 21, 2010 07:04 PM)
cool, i didnt mean to be a trollim not like that and after seeing him in other movies i take it back, but yes, he was a tad bad in the misthe is smoking hot though lolthanks for the kind reply i appreciate it
-
lewiskendell — 15 years ago(April 26, 2010 08:31 PM)
I haven't been particularly impressed by anything he's done besides Boogie Nights (where he only had a small role, as other have said) and Arrested Development (where he had an even smaller role). Some actors you're going to like more than they "deserve" (I feel this way about Olivia Wilde), and some you're going to dislike more than others (Channing Tatum and Nicolas Cage for me shudder). It's all subjective, there's no universal absolute best actor or worst actor. If you think he's horrible, that's fine. Probably not the best idea to say it in such strong terms on his message board, though.
-
BigWhiskers — 15 years ago(June 09, 2010 08:29 PM)
I agree . In "The Mist" he was so bad it wasn't funny and the Punisher only adds to it . The guy simply cannot act , I mean how does he keep getting work ?
He's not good looking or a body builder type ,you know think Arny or Stallone ,they couldn't act but they had the body people liked to see on screen and did the tongue in cheek well. This guy just plain stinks - he has no talent and if his life depended on it couldn't even do a kids play. I think he should be banned from doing anything in front of a camera including stills.
"So, a thought crossed your mind? Must have been a long and lonely journey"