Is she against gay marriage?
-
AngryNegroMan — 10 years ago(May 07, 2015 01:29 AM)
Reread the "Christian bible" Jezus was NOT Love Love Love all of the time nor was he as forgiving as people claim. He name called, he insulted, he beat people with a whip, he fought the leaders of his time. He never said "All of you will go to Heaven"
And we DO CHOOSE WHO WE LOVE. We dont Love ugly women, we Love women that we ARE ATTRACTED TO.
CHRISTIANITY IS PRO LAW OF MOSES not anti Law -
kubrickation — 15 years ago(February 04, 2011 01:30 PM)
it's not about the right to marry just someone, you fool, it's about the right to marry someone with whom you're genuinely in love. your logic (if one could call it that) presents marriage to someone to whom they're not attracted as the only viable option for gay men and women. that's asinine. your bigotry is no different from that of anti-miscegenation supportersit's just more modern.
-
Jfk78 — 15 years ago(February 08, 2011 07:31 AM)
kubrickation as has been repeatedly pointed out by many on this thread marriage has wider implications than simply being in love. Its a hollow pursuit of a perceived right that your talking about. Everybody has the right to be with who they love and everbody should ideally have the right to have that union recognised by law. Its only those who wis1c84h to remain ignorant that would perceive my points as bigotry. Instead of judging me perhaps one should stand back and look at the wider long term implications of what they are proposing to society as a whole.
-
Gah-freight — 15 years ago(February 12, 2011 12:36 PM)
I really don't know how this arguments been strung on this long cus it's simply that some people that are stopping gay marriage so why don't those people change? So that a group aren't restricted more than other groups. Marriage is like a social thing so is obviously not set in stone
-
Jfk78 — 15 years ago(November 02, 2010 04:26 AM)
I assume your referring to interracial marriage. Being gay is not a race. The argument there was to keep racial purity. Thats not an issue with gay people for obvious reasons and only an idiot would think children raised by gay people would become gay because of itso its not applicable in this situation. It is about what marriage is and it is about rootsbloodlinesancestory descendents. The joining of two families. The continuance of family. Offspring. Its not society the excludes gay people from marriage. Its that marriage runs contradictory to the gay lifestyle. They cant reproduce together. Its that simple. Sure one could say the same for sterile couples but they are not a subculture. They are an unfortunate butb68 small proportion of the hetrosexual culture. Man and woman were specifically formed and created depending on ones beliefsto produce offspring together and throughout history dynasty after dynasty has done just that. I myself can trace my family history back centuries. Marriage after marriage completely randomly occurring and presently I am the product of that. I look at my daughter and I see the many generations yet to come. When gay couples can reproduce without any outside help then they have to be included in marriage. Until then they need to accept their lifestyle choice just as they had to accept their sexuality. I dont want my daughter growing up in a world where family and bloodties are an
-
-
frontman1232004 — 15 years ago(November 04, 2010 12:54 AM)
But just not gay?
So, to paraphrase this rather lengthy and rambling statement, you are denying gay marriage because it violates your interpretation of so-called natural law and at least partially on creationism. You believe gayness is a choice.
Okay, marriage is about reproduction FOR YOU. For sterile couples and the unfortunate but small proportion of the heterosexual culture it is about 2 people being in love and wanting it accorded the same respect as a heterosexual couple.
You are proclaiming your heterosexual, child-producing couple is more worthy of recognition and respect than any heterosexual or homosexual childless couple.
Good luck with that. Im done. -
Jfk78 — 15 years ago(November 14, 2010 12:57 AM)
Gayness is not a choice but I dont see why that should affect the marriage ceremony. Its good you are done because your not making any sense. You simply vaguely dismiss any point you dont agree with as self styled openminded people are prone to do.
-
AngryNegroMan — 10 years ago(May 07, 2015 01:36 AM)
Homosexuality is a choice. God (who is not Jezus) would not say "kill homosexuals" in Leviticus and then go make people gay. He would be leading them to death and being a hypocrite!
It is written "He made them MALE AND FEMALE FOR EACHOTHER" -
Jfk78 — 13 years ago(August 09, 2012 12:15 PM)
I wouldnt personally call being gay a choice but the lifestyle they lead is certainly an alternative to the accepted norm. It should be viewed as just that in my opinion instead of trying to pretend that it holds the same meaning to the wider society as hetrosexuality. It doesnt, it simply holds meaning to the individual and it is that individuality that should be acknowledged. Indeed I would see not doing that as being discrimation but others seem to see it as being the other way around. We are discrimating against gays because we are not pretending that they are in the same relationship as straight couples. Its not any less valid to be gay but it is an alternative lifestyle. Why are people hellbent on covering their ears and ignoring that?
-
-
kubrickation — 13 years ago(September 28, 2012 10:12 AM)
<
First of all-are you SURE there's no "gay gene?" You don't seem like the type who's regularly perusing scientific journals. You shouldn't make sweeping claims like that without the proper knowledge to back them up.
Secondly, what does it matter if it's a choice or not? There's nothing wrong with it. The "nature vs nurture" argument is irrelevant here. Two adults having a consensual relationship with consensual sex are not hurting anyone. You have no right to even think about regulating it. You don't have to agree with it-you just need to shut the hell up and not interfere. You're an idiot.